Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.5  |  Development of UK strategy and options, September to November 2002 –
the negotiation of resolution 1441
if we have to occupy … Iraq”. He did not “want to make too much of this” but wondered
if it suggested “a new wariness at the heart of the [US] Administration”.
Final stages of the negotiation of resolution 1441
754.  Cabinet was informed on 31 October that a UN resolution was likely to be
agreed the following week.
755.  On 31 October, Mr Straw told the Cabinet that the Security Council was in the
final stages of the negotiation of a resolution on Iraq.255 The text would need to meet
French concerns that it would not provide a pretext for war and UK and US concerns to
avoid too restrictive a formulation on what would follow an Iraqi breach of the resolution.
The most likely outcome was a resolution the following week. The pressure to reach
closure was “growing”.
756.  In discussion the need for the inspection regime to be tough and for existing
defects to be rectified, and for the resolution to provide for further discussion in the
Security Council, were raised.
757.  Mr Blair concluded that a “robust resolution was required which would send a clear
message to Saddam Hussein. If Iraq did not comply there would be further discussion
in the … Security Council of the next steps.”
758.  Mr Straw told Mr Ivanov on 1 November that if Iraq did not comply, the draft
resolution meant the issue would “have to go back to the Security Council to
decide what action was required”.
759.  In a conversation with Mr Straw on 1 November, Mr Ivanov stated that efforts
should be concentrated on two sets of questions:
The provisions in the resolution on inspection procedures should reflect the
views of Dr Blix and Dr ElBaradei. In his view, that would be “difficult, but
feasible”.
What happened in the event that a resolution was violated.256
760.  Mr Ivanov was reported to be content for the resolution to contain references
to previous material breaches:
“But the resolution had to be careful about future material breaches. He did not want
a situation where military action could be automatically sanctioned without further
reference to the Security Council.”
255 Cabinet Conclusions, 31 October 2002.
256 Telegram 583 from FCO London to Washington, 1 November 2002, ‘Iraq: Foreign Secretary’s
Conversation with Russian Foreign Minister, 1 November’.
331
Previous page | Contents | Next page