The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
the UN
question. And how did we do it without provoking uproar across the
Middle
East? That
was the Arab question.”
449.
The Inquiry
asked Mr Blair to address in a written statement how the
US
Administration
would have interpreted the opening sentence of his Note and
whether
that
corresponded with the degree of the commitment he wanted to
give.171
450.
Mr Blair did
not respond directly. In the context of a section of his
statement
addressing
the fact that the US had no need of a further UN resolution before
acting,
Mr Blair
wrote that the Note had:
“… set out
… the strong reason why, politically, I thought a UN resolution
was
necessary,
primarily to build a broad coalition against Saddam and to show
we
were prepared
to disarm him peacefully.”172
451.
Mr Blair also
wrote:
“I could
not and did not offer some kind of ‘blank cheque’ in how we
accomplished
our shared
objectives.”173
452.
Asked
subsequently to tell the Inquiry what was in the Note, Mr Blair
said that
he thought
he had amended the opening sentence and commented: “Frankly I
think
he
[Sir David Manning] would have preferred me not to have given
any undertaking
“What I was
saying to President Bush was very clear and simple. It is: You can
count
on us. We
are going to be with you in tackling this, but here are the
difficulties.”
454.
The Note had
been “about all the issues and difficulties”. In Mr Blair’s view,
there
was “a very
clear and simple decision to take”. America was “going to tackle
this issue”.
His first
question for President Bush was “do we want it to be a coalition?”
His “belief
was it was
extremely important for the international community to hold
together at this
point”. He
did not see 11 September “as an attack on America”. It was “an
attack on us
“America
could do it unilaterally. Of course they could, but I would prefer
them to do
it
multilaterally. So in a sense what I was saying to America was …
‘Whatever the
political
heat, if I think this is the right thing to do I am going to be
with you. I am not
171
Inquiry
request for a written statement, 13 December 2010, Qs 2e and 2f,
page 1.
172
Statement,
14 January 2011, page 5.
173
Statement,
14 January 2011, page 4.
174
Public
hearing, 21 January 2011, page 47.
175
Public
hearing, 21 January 2011, pages 47-48.
78