Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
the UN question. And how did we do it without provoking uproar across the Middle
East? That was the Arab question.”
449.  The Inquiry asked Mr Blair to address in a written statement how the US
Administration would have interpreted the opening sentence of his Note and whether
that corresponded with the degree of the commitment he wanted to give.171
450.  Mr Blair did not respond directly. In the context of a section of his statement
addressing the fact that the US had no need of a further UN resolution before acting,
Mr Blair wrote that the Note had:
“… set out … the strong reason why, politically, I thought a UN resolution was
necessary, primarily to build a broad coalition against Saddam and to show we
were prepared to disarm him peacefully.”172
451.  Mr Blair also wrote:
“I could not and did not offer some kind of ‘blank cheque’ in how we accomplished
our shared objectives.”173
452.  Asked subsequently to tell the Inquiry what was in the Note, Mr Blair said that
he thought he had amended the opening sentence and commented: “Frankly I think
he [Sir David Manning] would have preferred me not to have given any undertaking
at all.”174
453.  Mr Blair stated:
“What I was saying to President Bush was very clear and simple. It is: You can count
on us. We are going to be with you in tackling this, but here are the difficulties.”
454.  The Note had been “about all the issues and difficulties”. In Mr Blair’s view, there
was “a very clear and simple decision to take”. America was “going to tackle this issue”.
His first question for President Bush was “do we want it to be a coalition?” His “belief
was it was extremely important for the international community to hold together at this
point”. He did not see 11 September “as an attack on America”. It was “an attack on us
… the West”.175
455.  Mr Blair added:
“America could do it unilaterally. Of course they could, but I would prefer them to do
it multilaterally. So in a sense what I was saying to America was … ‘Whatever the
political heat, if I think this is the right thing to do I am going to be with you. I am not
171  Inquiry request for a written statement, 13 December 2010, Qs 2e and 2f, page 1.
172  Statement, 14 January 2011, page 5.
173  Statement, 14 January 2011, page 4.
174  Public hearing, 21 January 2011, page 47.
175  Public hearing, 21 January 2011, pages 47-48.
78
Previous page | Contents | Next page