Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.3  |  Development of UK strategy and options, April to July 2002
Crawford meeting, but he had remained in contact with the Legal Secretary to the Law
Officers over the following months.87
193.  Mr McKane told the Inquiry that the main consideration in deciding when to engage
Lord Goldsmith was the difficulty in seeking formal advice when there wasn’t a specific
proposition to put before him.88
194.  Asked about Lord Goldsmith’s request to be involved in Ministerial thinking about
Iraq policy as it developed rather than at the last minute, Lord Wilson told the Inquiry that
there had been no need to involve the Attorney General as no decisions needed to be
taken. He offered the view that Lord Goldsmith might have written to the Cabinet Office
because previous incidents had taught him the importance and difficulty of the issues
involved in military action, and the importance of being involved early.89
Liaison Committee, 16 July 2002
195.  Mr Blair told the Liaison Committee on 16 July that he believed weapons
of mass destruction posed an enormous threat to the world.
196.  There was no doubt that Iraq posed a threat in respect of weapons of
mass destruction which should be dealt with. No decisions had been taken on
military action.
197.  Mr Blair was not seeking to influence the US but to work in partnership.
198.  The question of military action in Iraq was raised during Oral Questions to the
Defence Secretary on 15 July. Mr Hoon assured Mrs Alice Mahon (Labour) that:
“Absolutely no decisions have been taken by the British Government in relation to
operations in Iraq or anywhere near Iraq … I can assure the House that any such
decision would be properly reported to the House.”90
199.  In response to a subsequent question from Mr Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
about links between Al Qaida and the Iraqi regime, Mr Hoon replied that there was no
evidence of any direct links and any new information would be investigated.91 He added:
“Let us not be in any doubt about Iraq. We cannot ignore the threat it poses to the
international community. We have always made it clear that the world would be
a much better and safer place without Saddam Hussein.”
87  Public hearing, 19 January 2011, page 44.
88  Public hearing, 19 January 2011, page 47.
89  Public hearing, 25 January 2011, pages 60-61.
90  House of Commons, Official Report, 15 July 2002, column 10.
91  House of Commons, Official Report, 15 July 2002, column 11.
37
Previous page | Contents | Next page