Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
“The key thing was to get the right players together so you could have a proper,
frank discussion and take the decisions necessary …”70
Sir Kevin Tebbit’s advice, 3 July 2002
154.  Sir Kevin Tebbit wrote to Mr Hoon on 3 July setting out his concerns about
the absence of a strategic framework for the military plan and the dilemma for
the UK that being drawn into US planning potentially posed.
155.  Sir Kevin concluded that the UK could not count on a military campaign
being unlikely or, if the US went ahead, that the UK could avoid being linked to
the campaign.
156.  Sir Kevin advised that a “credible political plan”, which addressed the
conditions for UK participation and moved American planning into acceptable
channels and slowed it down, was needed.
157.  Having seen a draft of Mr Watkins’ letter to No.10, Sir Kevin Tebbit wrote to
Mr Hoon on 3 July setting out a number of concerns.71
158.  Sir Kevin advised:
“While I have no objection to … the course of action proposed I think we should be
under no illusions about the extent of the stakes as presented, or the need to raise
our Whitehall game, politically, diplomatically, financially as well as militarily if we
are to proceed further. This is not to say that I do not support the idea of engaging in
planning … nor even that we should not agree to participate in an operation against
Iraq if the conditions are acceptable, but the task ahead is formidable.
“… The picture … is of a military plan being worked up in a policy vacuum, with
no strategic framework which paves the way; in terms of rationale, preparation of
public opinion through threat assessments, WMD risks and the like, or creation of
the legal base; and no clearly defined end state, in terms of successor government
and relations with the Arab world. There will, I suspect, be a natural tendency for
Ministerial colleagues … to run a mile from what may appear at first (and second)
sight to be a harebrained scheme with all sorts of costs and risks attached.
“Ministers will need to be helped over that hump. It may be that an Iraq campaign
is unlikely to happen, given the problems … But we certainly cannot count on that
or that we could avoid being linked to a US military campaign if it did happen …
I do not think it is a responsible option for us to let matters run without greater active
engagement designed seriously to influence US conceptual as well as operational
thinking, albeit at the risk that we could end up converting an unviable plan into
a credible one.
70  Public hearing, 29 January 2010, pages 224-226.
71  Minute Tebbit to Secretary of State [MOD], 3 July 2002, ‘Iraq’.
30
Previous page | Contents | Next page