Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.3  |  Development of UK strategy and options, April to July 2002
62.  Sir David Manning was in Washington on 17 May, for discussions on a range of
issues including India and Pakistan and the Middle East Peace Process (MEPP).30
63.  In preparation for Sir David Manning’s visit to Washington, Sir Christopher Meyer
reported in a personal letter that he had been told by a senior official in the State
Department that:
The timeframe discussed between the Prime Minister and Bush was still valid:
the first quarter of next year was “realistic” for action against Saddam Hussein.
CENTCOM was hearing from British military sources that we were
contemplating contributing an armoured division.
This was serious stuff which was leading Administration hawks to forget the
“but” in our “yes, but …”31
64.  Sir Christopher also recorded that it was doubtful that much work had been done
on handling the UN and getting the weapons inspectors back in and that the nightmare
would be if Dr Hans Blix, Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC, judged that the Iraqis were
co-operating and the US did not.
65.  Sir Christopher advised that the UK had “been drawn into a fierce inter-agency
battle on the Middle East and Iraq”. That was “unavoidable if we are to retain a handle
on what is going on [in] areas of vital importance to our national interest. But it does
mean that we have to tread with the greatest care”.
66.  Sir Christopher told the Inquiry, that he had been told by a senior American official
“shortly after Crawford” that there were problems with the UK’s “yes, but” approach:
“the ‘yes’ was greedily devoured by the American Administration, but the ‘buts’ had kind
of faded away”.32
67.  In discussions with Dr Rice on Iraq, Sir David told her that the UK’s “offer of military
support for a campaign against Saddam was firm. But we must go the UN inspectors
route first; we must stabilise Arab/Israel … and we must prepare public opinion.”33
He was assured that the UK would be brought into the planning process at a very
early stage, once such planning got under way.
68.  In a separate report to Mr Blair, Sir David warned that, in the light of the US
perception that the UK was considering providing an armoured division, there were
dangers that the “moderates in Washington” were worried that “the hawks” would
30  Minute Manning to Prime Minister, 19 May 2002, ‘Visit to Washington: 17 May’.
31  Letter Meyer to Manning, 15 May 2002, ‘Your Visit to Washington’.
32  Public hearing, 26 November 2009, page 64.
33  Letter Rycroft to McDonald, 18 May 2002, ‘David Manning’s Visit to Washington, 17 May; Iraq’.
15
Previous page | Contents | Next page