Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.2  |  Development of UK strategy and options, January to April 2002 – “axis of evil” to Crawford
489.  In late March 2002, Lord Goldsmith, Attorney General, informed Mr Hoon and
Mr Straw that there could be considerable difficulties in justifying the use of force
without further action by the Security Council.
490.  Lord Goldsmith was seeking to avoid Ministers making apparently
authoritative statements before he had been asked to give his views.
491.  On 24 March, both Mr Straw and Mr Hoon were interviewed on television and
asked questions about the legal basis for any military action against Iraq.
492.  In response to a question about whether international law provided a mandate to
attack Iraq during an interview on Breakfast with Frost on 24 March, Mr Straw replied:
“… we have never been involved in any military action in our history since the
establishment of the United Nations without the backing of international law and
we’re not going to be …
“We don’t have a mandate to invade Iraq now, no … what we need to do however is
to ensure the full compliance by Iraq … with these United Nations obligations … if
Iraq refuses to comply … then the position in international law may very well change
… Nobody wants military action … at all and the way out lies very clearly in Saddam
Hussein’s hands.
“… But, on the fundamental issue, do you need to ensure that any action that
is taken is justified in international law, there can only be one answer and that
is yes.”177
493.  Later the same day, in an interview by Mr Jonathan Dimbleby on ITV about the
deployment of 1,700 Royal Marines to Afghanistan, Mr Hoon was asked whether, if
Saddam Hussein did not allow weapons inspectors in or only allowed them in on terms
which the US and UK found unacceptable, the UK would insist on having a mandate
from the United Nations Security Council or were the existing resolutions enough to
validate military action.178 Mr Hoon replied: “In principle they would be, not least because
those weapons of mass destruction might well be capable of posing a threat to the
United Kingdom in which case we will be entitled to act in self defence.”
494.  Asked whether Ms Clare Short, the International Development Secretary, was
correct to say that it was not tolerable to act militarily against Saddam Hussein without
a UN mandate, Mr Hoon replied: “well what I am saying is that legally we would be
perfectly entitled to use force without a specific United Nations resolution”.
177  BBC Breakfast with Frost, 24 March 2002.
178  Jonathan Dimbleby ITV, 24 March 2002.
475
Previous page | Contents | Next page