The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
•
The
international community should proceed in a measured
and
determined
way to decide how to respond to the real threat
represented
by the
Iraqi regime.
•
No decision
to launch further military action had been taken and
any
action
taken would be in accordance with international law.
227.
As agreed the
previous week, Cabinet discussed Iraq on 7 March.79
228.
Mr Straw told
Cabinet that “in view of the current media speculation about
military
action in
Iraq, it was important to remind his colleagues of the background
to the current
situation”.
President Saddam Hussein had launched “an unprovoked invasion of
Kuwait
in 1990”.
Following his defeat in 1991, 27 separate obligations had been
imposed on
Iraq by the
UN Security Council; Saddam Hussein’s regime had met only three.
The:
“… regime
continued to pose a threat to peace through its development of
weapons
of mass
destruction (WMD) and the means to deliver them. United Nations
weapons
inspectors
had been forced to leave Iraq in 1998 because they were close
to
exposing
the full extent of … Saddam Hussein’s programmes. Iraq’s
neighbours
were
concerned about the threat to peace posed by … Saddam … but feared
that
military
action which did not result in his removal would strengthen his
position.”
“…
sanctions imposed by the United Nations were not preventing food
and other
humanitarian
goods from reaching Iraq. Contracts to the value of $30 billion
had
been
approved under the Oil-for-Food programme … The United Kingdom
alone
had given
£100 million in humanitarian aid to Iraq. Negotiations were … in
train
to change
the sanctions regime so that, with the exception of those military
and
dual‑use
goods included on a Goods Review List, all goods could be
imported
… without
the prior approval of the United Nations. President Saddam
Hussein’s
regime had
to comply fully with all relevant … Security Council resolutions,
including
the
elimination of all WMD … to normalise its relations …”
“No
decision had been taken on launching further military action
against the Iraqi
regime, but
it was important to ensure that the British public and
international
opinion
understood the true nature of the threat posed by the regime and
the need
to respond
effectively.”
79
Cabinet
Conclusions, 7 March 2002.
426