Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
showed that “two thirds of the civilians killed in the last six months died as a result of
coalition bombing”.85
120.  Mr Straw said that he had not seen those figures.86
121.  An MOD official provided a contribution to the FCO’s response to No.10 on
13 October.87 The MOD official confirmed that the MOD did not estimate civilian
casualties because it believed that there was no reliable method for doing so, adding:
“This is not merely our public line but our genuine judgement.”
122.  The official dismissed the suggestion, made by the FCO, that the civilian casualty
figures that were reported to the weekly Chiefs of Staff meeting could serve as a reliable
estimate of total civilian casualties. Those figures were compiled by the US based on
incomplete “reporting of incidents” to US Corps HQ. The figures were reported to Chiefs
of Staff as trends in them indicated whether the security situation was improving or
deteriorating.
123.  The official concluded by re‑stating:
“… the MOD does not produce an estimate of civilian casualties, either within
our own area of operation or across Iraq. We have no methodology which would
enable us to do this; nor do we believe it possible to define a methodology that
would produce figures meaningful enough to alleviate No.10’s concern about public
presentation.”
124.  The FCO replied to No.10 on 14 October, having consulted UK advisers in the
Iraqi MOH.88 The FCO recommended that the UK should not take any ownership of
figures of civilian casualties; none of the estimates available were reliable, and the UK
Government would have difficulty in defending the methodology behind them to the
media and Parliament.
125.  The UK would also have difficulty in compiling its own statistics:
“We rarely have our own people on the ground following terrorist attacks, often
relying on press statistics. But their figures result in widely varying estimates …”
126.  The FCO advised that it regarded hospital and mortuary admissions collated by
the Iraqi MOH as the “most reliable” figures available, although there were a number
of deficiencies:
Monthly and six‑monthly MOH reports were not consistent.
85  House of Commons, Official Report, 12 October 2004, column 160.
86  House of Commons, Official Report, 12 October 2004, column 162.
87  Minute MOD [junior official] to FCO [junior official], 13 October 2004, [untitled].
88  Letter Owen to Quarrey, 14 October 2004, ‘Iraq: Civilian Casualty Figures’; Minute FCO [junior official]
to Owen, 13 October 2004, ‘Iraq: Civilian Casualty Figures’.
192
Previous page | Contents | Next page