Previous page | Contents | Next page
17  |  Civilian casualties
Military Police (RMP) had begun investigations into 17 civilian fatalities allegedly caused
by UK forces.67
90.  Mr Straw wrote to Mr Hoon on 18 November to ask that the MOD examine whether
it would be viable to collate information on post‑conflict civilian casualties inflicted
lawfully and in accordance with the UK’s Rules of Engagement by UK forces (and
other troop contributors) in the UK’s Area of Responsibility.68 Mr Straw recalled recent
media and NGO reporting on the “allegedly high levels of civilian casualties inflicted by
Coalition forces” and the level of Parliamentary and public interest, and continued:
“I recognise fully the difficulties involved in compiling accurate statistics about civilian
casualties, particularly during combat operations. But I am concerned that the
current UK/US position – that ‘there is no reliable means of ascertaining the number
of civilian casualties, even in post‑conflict Iraq’ – leaves the field entirely open to our
critics and lets them set the agenda …
“We need to find ways of countering the damaging perception that civilians are being
killed needlessly, and in large numbers, by Coalition forces.”
91.  Mr Straw referred to the work of IBC, which he described as having “some credibility
(within the sourcing limitations)”.
92.  Mr Hoon’s Private Office passed Mr Straw’s letter to PJHQ, asking for a draft reply.69
Mr Hoon’s Private Office commented that they had already asked PJHQ to identify the
total number of civilians killed by UK forces since the end of major combat operations.
93.  PJHQ replied to Mr Hoon’s Private Office on 25 November.70 It confirmed that
assessment reports (ASSESSREPs) recorded the detail of contacts and incidents in
the UK’s Area of Operations, including details of civilian “casualties or deaths”. It would
take two weeks to review all ASSESSREPs produced since 1 May 2003, to determine
the number of Iraqi civilian casualties. The number produced would not be “definitive
or entirely comprehensive”; ASSESSREPs would only cover incidents which were
witnessed by or involved UK forces.
94.  PJHQ also advised:
“The current line, that there is no reliable way of knowing how many casualties there
have been … was perfectly reasonable during the decisive combat phase of Op
TELIC … as long‑range attacks meant that there was no source on the ground to
verify … casualty numbers.
67  House of Commons, Official Report, 13 November 2003, column 433W.
68  Letter Foreign Secretary to Defence Secretary, 18 November 2003, ‘Iraq: Civilian Casualties’.
69  Minute APS/Secretary to State [MOD] to PJHQ J9 Hd Pl/Ops, 18 November 2003, ‘Iraq – Civilian
Casualties’.
70  Minute PJHQ J9 to APS/Secretary of State [MOD], 25 November 2003, ‘OP TELIC: Civilian Casualties’.
187
Previous page | Contents | Next page