Previous page | Contents | Next page
16.3  |  Military fatalities and the bereaved
that the families of those who died are due more of an explanation of the history
than the Board of Inquiry could be expected to provide. I have therefore decided to
put in place a review of the arrangements for assuring the airworthiness and safe
operation of the Nimrod aircraft over its service life; to assess where responsibility
lies for any failures; to assess more broadly the process for compiling safety cases,
taking account of best practice in the civilian and military world; and to make
recommendations.”105
177.  Mr Browne discussed the BOI into the loss of Nimrod XV230 with MOD Ministerial
colleagues the following day.106 He said that the MOD would shortly announce the name
of the Queen’s Counsel who would lead the independent review. It would be important
for the families to be able to feed their questions into that process.
178.  During the meeting, MOD Ministers concluded that the Nimrod BOI was “a further
example of the [BOI] process not necessarily being suited to the requirements of the
MOD, the individuals and families involved and, crucially, public expectation”. Mr Browne
suggested that there might be merit in a new process comprising:
“... a short, focused Learning Account style review ... conducted in a matter of a
few months followed, as required, by a further review to look beyond the immediate
circumstances and which was empowered to engage with individuals and the
families affected by the incident, had an independent element and could draw
from the advice of those who were well‑practiced in preparing for evidence‑based
reviews”.
179.  Mr Browne’s Private Secretary asked Mr Bill Jeffrey, the MOD’s Permanent Under
Secretary,107 to provide “advice on the scope and options for improving the BOI process”
by the end of January.
180.  Mr Browne’s Private Office wrote to Mr Ainsworth’s Private Office later that week,
reporting Mr Browne’s concern that recent good progress in clearing the backlog of
inquests would not be sustained as the military investigation/BOI process was moving
too slowly.108 Particular concerns included:
The significant number of cases (13) over six months that were still awaiting
completion of a BOI or RMP investigation, or even a decision on whether a BOI
was required. In one case, a decision on whether to hold a BOI was still awaited
nearly one year after the incident.
The number of cases where the Swindon and Wiltshire Coroner was awaiting
SIB reports.
105  House of Commons, Official Report, 4 December 2007, column 687.
106  Minute Forber to PS/Minister(AF) [MOD], 5 December 2007, ‘Defence Ministerial Meetings’.
107  Mr Jeffrey was knighted in the 2008 New Year’s Honours.
108  Minute APS/Secretary of State [MOD] to PS/Minister(AF) [MOD], 7 December 2007, ‘BOI and
Inquest Backlog’.
109
Previous page | Contents | Next page