Previous page | Contents | Next page
16.3  |  Military fatalities and the bereaved
to relax the MOD’s policy on the retention of SFA and to improve the quality of AFPAA
correspondence. Lt Gen Palmer also advised that:
He had directed that all MOD correspondence should be routed through the
deceased’s unit and the VO, and all MOD visits to bereaved families should
be co‑ordinated by the VO.
Further work would be done to develop “simple and readable” guidance, to
improve the tone of correspondence, and to develop a comprehensive guide
to the sources of advice and support available.
Further work would be done to assess the selection, training and education
of CNOs and VOs.
58.  In March 2004, the MOD concluded a study to identify improvements to their
investigative and Board of Inquiry (BOI) processes.41 While the study focused on the
investigative and BOI processes themselves, it recommended that:
Commands should establish a senior focal point with responsibility for
pro‑actively monitoring all investigations and BOIs;
all communication with families should be routed through a “single established
and known contact”, who could explain the context of any correspondence and
“head‑off any infelicitous or insensitive drafting”; and
a “knowledgeable and consistent” officer should regularly brief families on the
detail and progress of the entire investigation and BOI process.
59.  On 24 June, Lt Gen Palmer reported to Air Chief Marshal (ACM) Sir Anthony
Bagnall, Vice Chief of Defence Staff (VCDS), that each Service had now appointed a
“Senior Co‑ordinator” to act as a focal point for monitoring investigations and Inquiries.42
Lt Gen Palmer also gave ACM Bagnall the “specific reassurance” that he had requested
that each Service had undertaken to provide regular briefings to next of kin on process
and progress. All communication with the next of kin would be routed through a single
contact (normally the VO) who would “act as a sift” to filter out any insensitive or
inconsistent drafting.
60.  Lt Gen Palmer advised ACM Bagnall that a study into Services’ bereavement
support procedures, including the training provided to CNOs and VOs, had now
reported. The study had concluded that:
While it might seem logical to adopt a tri‑Service approach to bereavement
support procedures, it was reasonable for each Service to continue to use their
41  Paper MOD [junior official], 25 March 2004 [incorrectly dated on original as 24 February 2004],
‘Inquiries/Investigations into Death or Serious Injury on Operations: Scope for Improvement and
Tri‑Service Harmonisation – a Short Study for VCDS/DCDS(Pers)’.
42  Minute DCDS(Pers) to VCDS, 24 June 2004, ‘Inquiries into Unnatural Death and Serious Injury:
Improvements in Process and Briefing’.
87
Previous page | Contents | Next page