Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
779.  Mr Jeffrey explained that the paper proposed “a formal standing cross‑Government
group” on security and reported that he had agreed to create a new Directorate of
Operational Deployment Capability in PJHQ to provide a single focus within the MOD.
780.  Mr Jeffrey visited Iraq with Sir Peter Ricketts and Ms Susan Wardell, DFID Director
General Operations, from 4 to 7 December 2007.
781.  Mr Jeffrey’s briefing included a paper from Mr Jon Day, MOD Director General
Operational Policy, about the use of MOD civilians in operational theatres.495 Mr Day
expressed concern about “whether we are right to continue the current course in high
risk environments such as Iraq and (increasingly) Afghanistan”. Concerns about security
had led the FCO to spend £37 million per annum on close protection for their “relatively
small number” of staff in Iraq. The security threat had also:
“… introduced a risk averse culture which is preventing MOD civilians embedded in
the Embassy and working in the Iraqi MOD from doing their jobs effectively – to such
an extent that I am increasingly inclined to start pulling them out.
“… [T]he growing difficulty we are having in filling posts suggests that some – many
– will not be as suitable as we would wish. I am not at all sure that all of the civilians
I met in Iraq would pass the new S2O fitness and health tests …”
782.  Mr Jeffrey described much of what was being done by MOD civilians in Iraq as
“a legacy of the more benign environments of the Balkans and post‑TELIC 1 euphoria”.
Nobody appeared to be auditing the roles filled by civilians against the much more
hostile conditions that had prevailed until recently in Iraq. Mr Jeffrey cited the example
of civilian finance staff, whose roles could be taken by appropriately trained service
personnel. The MOD should minimise the number of non‑essential civilian posts in
operational theatres. A small number of posts would have to be filled by civilians –
POLADs and perhaps scientific and contracts staff – but the right people would not
volunteer “simply for the money”. The MOD should “listen to what the current generation
say will continue to motivate them”.
783.  Mr Jeffrey advised discussing a coherent and sustainable approach to duty of care
with the FCO, observing that “at present we are less risk aware than the FCO in Iraq but
more risk aware in Afghanistan!”.
784.  Mr Benn told the Inquiry:
… you need to have a common approach for everybody, not a difference between
departments and that includes a responsibility of the duty of care you have for
consultants and contractors whom you have asked to come and work”.496
495  Minute DG Op Pol to 2nd PUS [MOD], 9 November 2007, ‘MOD Civilians in Operational Theatres’.
496  Public hearing, 2 February 2010, pages 43‑44.
376
Previous page | Contents | Next page