Previous page | Contents | Next page
15.1 | Civilian personnel
666.  Officials explained that the search for Arabic speakers across the three services
had exhausted the pool of suitably qualified regular soldiers, and the mobilisation
of reserves had exhausted the pool of linguists in the Territorial Army (TA). Training
individuals to the level required for the 39 core posts took 10‑12 months.
667.  MOD officials explained that allocating 18 of the 39 posts to civilians offered a
partial solution, but there was still a need to fill the remaining 21 posts every six months
for the foreseeable future. Proposals included:
an increase in the provision of training by the Defence School of Languages;
expansion of the pool of TA linguists;
further civilianisation;
a request for FCO assistance, judged unlikely to succeed because of the FCO
commitment to the CPA; and
redeployment of Arabic‑speaking Defence and Military Attachés at British
Embassies, thought likely to damage relations with FCO staff in those
Embassies and affect working relationships with host countries.
668.  It is not clear from the papers seen by the Inquiry which, if any, of those
recommendations was implemented during Op TELIC.
669.  In early 2004, the press reported that several language students at UK universities
were putting their degrees on hold to work in Iraq as interpreters and translators for
the UK military.437 By mid‑February, 16 students had been employed, with five already
working in Iraq.
670.  MOD guidance on the military contribution to peace support operations published
in June 2004 made only passing references to language skills. It stated:
“The ability to negotiate and mediate will place a premium on basic language skills.
However, working through interpreters is currently more usual and therefore should
be practised before deployment.” 438
671.  The absence of clear UK military doctrine on language capability was addressed in
2013.439 A Joint Doctrine Note on linguistic support to operations stated that the military:
had only “a modest standing language capability … not well placed to support
operational planning or high readiness deployment needs”; and
had been “inherently slow to build capability for enduring operations”.
437  The Guardian, 18 February 2004, Language students to help army in Iraq.
438  Ministry of Defence, Joint Warfare Publication 3‑50: The Military Contribution to Peace Support
Operations, June 2004.
439  Ministry of Defence, Joint Doctrine Note 1/13: Linguistic Support to Operations, March 2013.
359
Previous page | Contents | Next page