Previous page | Contents | Next page
15.1 | Civilian personnel
294.  Mr Straw sent Mr Gordon Brown, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, an indication
of the estimated costs of post‑transition representation on 11 February as the basis
for detailed discussions between FCO and Treasury officials.207 Combined annual
running costs for the three bilateral offices were estimated at £37.1m, including
£21.7m (58.5 percent of the total) for security.
295.  Mr Straw attached a paper setting out the proposed functions of the three offices
and estimated staff numbers for Baghdad and Basra:
Baghdad: 78 resident UK staff (including police and MOD advisers), up to
20 visiting contractors and DFID staff during peak activity, and 55‑56 local staff;
and
Basra: 81 resident UK staff (including police), 10 visiting contractors and
30 local staff.
296.  The expectation was that it should be possible to reduce UK representation as
Iraq stabilised.
297.  The paper stated that office infrastructure and key staff should be in place by
the end of June. Recruitment of staff and development of sites would begin as soon
as agreement had been reached with the US on a number of issues, including the
use of potential sites. The plan was to recruit staff for one year if possible, six months
renewable if necessary. Recruitment would not be easy. As one incentive, the FCO
planned to give staff the option of having their families in Kuwait.
298.  The paper also stated that the FCO had created a project management team
in London, which had set up a cross‑Whitehall Transition Project Management Group
including representatives of interested government departments. An FCO officer had
been seconded to the State Department transition team and a UK civilian was a member
of the CPA Transition Team.
299.  Sir Kevin Tebbit explained the arrangements for looking after civilian personnel in
Iraq to Sir Andrew Turnbull and Permanent Secretaries on 21 April 2004.208 There were
two categories of civilian employee: MOD civilians deployed as part of Op TELIC, and
other staff and contractors, either seconded to the CPA or deployed directly to Iraq,
who were “under the wing of IraqRep”.
300.  Sir Kevin explained:
“… the 70‑80 MOD civil servants deployed at any one time in direct support of
Operation TELIC effectively enjoy the same protection as the military, alongside
whom they live and work. They would be unlikely to have to leave, but if they were,
the arrangements would be made through the Permanent Joint Headquarters
which is part of their reporting chain and also ‘owns’ the military transport assets.
This would be fairly straightforward given the numbers involved.
207  Letter Straw to Chancellor of the Exchequer, 11 February 2004, ‘Iraq: Post‑Transition Representation’.
208  Letter Tebbit to Turnbull, 21 April 2004, [untitled].
295
Previous page | Contents | Next page