Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
helicopters on operations given “the scale and intensity of our current operational
commitments”.
1266.  One of the principles underpinning the MOD’s approach to helicopters was
“to rationalise our helicopters by theatre”. Mr Browne added:
“While we are clear about the imperative to provide increased support to operations
in the short term, we are also concerned not to sacrifice the future sustainability of
the helicopter fleet for the immediate needs of today.”
1267.  Mr Browne wrote that helicopter support to operations in Iraq was “generally
assessed as satisfactory” and therefore additional capability for Afghanistan was
the priority.
1268.  The update noted that there were five Merlin and six Lynx in Basra and there
were seven helicopters in Baghdad. The Sea King fleet had been withdrawn earlier
than planned because of the reduction in troop levels and the helicopters were being
switched to Afghanistan, four having already been deployed.
1269.  The requirement for the six Danish Merlins procured to enable the release of the
Sea King fleet from Iraq had “fallen away along with our reduction in force levels there”
so the possibility of deploying them to Afghanistan was under consideration.
1270.  Mr Browne explained:
“It may seem counter‑intuitive that, despite the fact we have so many more
helicopters in our inventory, we are able to deploy a relatively small number on
operations. We are limited by the need to keep our burden on our airframes, crews
and ground support staff at a sustainable level over time. As a rule of thumb, it takes
three or four additional helicopters to enable the deployment of a single helicopter
on operations with the remaining aircraft used for training and to enable us to rotate
our deployed helicopters in and out of maintenance and to carry out essential
modification programmes.”
1271.  Mr Browne concluded:
“To borrow a line from David Cameron, there is no ‘magic pot’ of money into which
we can dip in order to buy all the helicopters we might like to. We do not have
access to the Treasury Reserve for the procurement of such enduring capabilities,
and helicopters must compete with other pressing requirements within our
hard‑pressed equipment programme. Equally neither are there any helicopters
currently readily available on the market which would be an obvious aspiration for
us; most order books are full, and the procurement of a new helicopter type would
be both costly and time‑consuming.
“That said, I can give you an assurance that, while we continue to make the most
of what we have got … This is not an area where we can afford complacency.
214
Previous page | Contents | Next page