Previous page | Contents | Next page
14.1  |  Military equipment (post-conflict)
damaging and had led directly to the need for force protection enhancements to
FV430 vehicles deployed in Iraq. The DMB stressed that it expected lessons to
be learned.
512.  The up‑armoured FV430 vehicles, known as Bulldog, began to deploy to Iraq in
December 2006.267
513.  Following his trip to Iraq in late 2006, General Sir Timothy Granville‑Chapman,
Vice Chief of the Defence Staff, recorded:
“Bulldog (up‑armoured and engined 430) received rave reviews for its protection
(not yet fully tested), mobility in tight streets and reduction in road/kerb damage.
The battlegroup’s hierarchy saw it as a sound medium capability for up to
10 years.”268
PROJECT VECTOR
514.  As the preceding text in this Section shows, the MOD had been considering
the potential requirement to deploy PPVs concurrently in Iraq and Afghanistan since
2004. In February 2005, it had been decided that, alongside the Snatch conversion
programme, 100 Vector vehicles should be procured.
515.  A business case for Project Vector, requesting approval to purchase 62 Vector
vehicles at a cost of £18.8m was submitted to the IAB on 13 March 2006.269 Those
vehicles were intended for Afghanistan. PJHQ accepted that the vehicles would not
be available before March 2007.
516.  The business case stated that “initial scoping studies” for a Vector vehicle solution
had considered “an increased capacity Snatch” but that had not been successful and
would not be considered any further as a suitable platform for Vector. That was due to
a “complete inability” to meet the Key User Requirement concerning the weight it was
expected to carry.
517.  Snatch 2 vehicles had been deployed to Afghanistan but had been “restricted to
urban patrols” because of their mobility issues and the extreme terrain. Vector would
offer a “substantial increase in the performance to that of Snatch 2 in terms of protection,
mobility and capacity”. On protection it stated:
“It can be seen that Vector can be used in a more hostile environment than Snatch
as is anticipated on Op HERRICK once full operations are undertaken.”
518.  The operational analysis had been conducted by DSTL.
519.  The business case stated: “Vector is currently CinC (LAND) [Gen Dannatt]’s
highest priority.”
267  House of Commons Standard Note, SN/IA/5128, 14 July 2009, Afghanistan: Equipment Issues.
268  Minute VCDS to CDS, 4 December 2006, ‘VCDS’s visit to Afghanistan and Iraq 27 Nov – 2 Dec 06’.
269  Paper DEC(SP), 13 March 2006, ‘Business Case – Project Vector’.
85
Previous page | Contents | Next page