Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
382.  The UOR for additional Warrior armour was approved and the MOD told the Inquiry
that that was fitted to vehicles in September 2005.191
383.  The minutes from the Chiefs of Staff meeting on 27 July stated:
“Following the recent attacks in Maysan, procedures have been modified to
counter the threat: TF [Taskforce] Maysan were now conducting patrols in Warrior,
and would not automatically respond to IED incidents to avoid being caught in
secondary explosions. An additional Warrior company and the Telic Reserve RE
[Royal Engineer] Search Team (from Cyprus) had been deployed into the area, with
the latter able to provide a surge capacity for up to 60 days. The current cycle of
attacks had ‘fixed’ CF [coalition forces] in the area and, as a result, progress on SSR
had stagnated; PJHQ had therefore asked for an urgent review of UK SH [support
helicopters] priorities, to see if further assets could be allocated to MND(SE) …”192
384.  Lt Gen Fry told the Chiefs of Staff that work on PIR IED countermeasures
continued, “but thus far they were only effective at very short range”:
“The importance was therefore stressed of countering the threat by all means
possible, including TTPs. DCDS(EC) confirmed that appropriate action was being
taken at the right tempo, and that the work was joined up with US efforts to counter
similar threats elsewhere in Iraq.”
385.  On 30 July, two British security guards employed by Control Risks Group were
killed while travelling in an armoured vehicle in Basra.193 The deaths were later attributed
to PIR EFPs.194
386.  AM Torpy’s report of his visit to Iraq in late July 2005 addressed the PIR EFP IED
attacks:
“With the exception of Maysan, incident levels across the AOR [Area of
Responsibility] remain low and there are no major issues. In Maysan, significant
effort is focused on building up an intelligence picture of the group suspected of
carrying out the EFP/PIR attacks … whilst at the same time improving overall force
protection measures. The GOC is also keen to gain more visibility of possible Iranian
infiltration across the border … and maintain the pace of SSR in Maysan.”195
191  Paper [MOD] to the Iraq Inquiry, [undated and untitled], in response to letter Aldred to Duke‑Evans
25 November 2010.
192  Minutes, 27 July 2005, Chiefs of Staff meeting.
193  Report Smith, 31 July 2005, ‘UK Chief Police Advisor‑Iraq: Weekly Report’.
194  Minute DJC to PS/SofS, 26 August 2005, ‘Iraq: Pre‑detonation of Passive Infra Red Initiated Roadside
Bombs’.
195  Minute PSO/CJO to PSO/CDS, 5 August 2005, ‘CJO Visit Report – Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq and
Qatar 25‑30 July 05’.
66
Previous page | Contents | Next page