Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
and that the FCO was considering whether there was scope to approach other countries
to contribute to UK military campaign costs (though the prospects were not good).116
Cash contributions to Operation GRANBY
There was precedent for approaching other governments to contribute to UK military
costs. Other governments pledged over £2bn to the UK to cover the costs incurred on
Operation GRANBY, the UK contribution to the international response to Iraq’s invasion
of Kuwait in 1990.117 The cost of Op GRANBY was some £2.5bn.
178.  Treasury officials advised Mr Boateng on 14 March that the MOD’s estimate for
infrastructure costs within the NACMO envelope included £10m for:
“CIMIC – Civilian‑Military co‑operation. This spend is for force protection with the
goal of pacifying local, potentially aggressive populations … This is an integral part
of military operations and is still within agreed control totals – due to over‑forecasting
in other areas …”118
179.  The MOD subsequently referred to that allocation as being for QIPs.119
180.  On 17 March, Cabinet took collective responsibility for the conclusion that:
“… the diplomatic process was now at an end. Saddam Hussein would be given an
ultimatum to leave Iraq; and the House of Commons would be asked to endorse the
use of military action against Iraq to enforce compliance, if necessary.”120
181.  Mr Brown told the Inquiry how he had responded to advice from Treasury officials
that he should raise the issue of the cost of the military options being considered by the
Government:
“I … made it clear that the military option had to be one that was best for the
military, and that the Treasury would not in any way interfere and suggest that there
were cost grounds for choosing one option against another. That was not our job.
The Treasury was there to advise on how we could deal with the financial issues that
arose from the military decisions and the political decisions that were made.
“So there was no time from June [2002] when the Treasury said, ‘This is a better
military option because it is cheaper or less costly’. At every point, I made it clear
that we would support whatever option the military decided upon with the Prime
116 Minute Dodd to Manning, 17 March 2003, ‘Ad Hoc Group on Iraq’.
117 Ministry of Defence, Statement of the Defence Estimates, 1991, Cm 1559‑I.
118 Minute Treasury [junior officials] to Chief Secretary, 14 March 2003, ‘Iraq Funding’.
119 Minute Dodd to Manning, 17 March 2003, ‘Ad Hoc Group on Iraq’; Minute Straw and Hoon to Blair,
19 March 2003, ‘Iraq: UK Military Contribution to Post‑Conflict Iraq’.
120 Cabinet Conclusions, 17 March 2003.
472
Previous page | Contents | Next page