Previous page | Contents | Next page
1.2  |  Development of UK strategy and options, September 2000 to September 2001
“Not really because there wasn’t any great confidence that UNMOVIC would be any
more successful than UNSCOM had been … and we didn’t think that we could force
Saddam through military action to accept an inspections regime.”122
213.  The record of the Camp David meeting, produced by Mr Sawers, stated that the
US and UK agreed on the need for a policy on Iraq which was more widely supported in
the Middle East region.123
214.  As a result of the policy of the previous 10 years, Iraq was not as large a threat as
it could have been (including to Kuwait); but Saddam Hussein was still pursuing WMD
(he had done little on the nuclear side).
215.  In Mr Blair’s view, the approach should be to:
refocus sanctions on those items which Saddam Hussein really needed;
control his money supply but allow him to use it for non-military economic
advancement; and
retain the capacity for military action.
216.  Mr Blair stated that we should not say that we were relaxing our policy because
sanctions had not worked.
217.  Mr Blair concluded that we must improve our public presentation. He suggested
that the approach should be presented as a “deal” comprising four elements:
do the right thing by the Iraqi people, with whom we have no quarrel;
tighten weapons controls on Saddam Hussein;
retain financial control on Saddam Hussein; and
retain our ability to strike.
218.  The record also reported a subsequent conversation between Mr Sawers and
Dr Rice. Dr Rice had agreed with Mr Sawers’ assessment that “we were still a long
way from having a new policy on Iraq”. Mr Sawers commended the work of INDICT
and stated that the UK favoured charging Saddam Hussein and a few others with war
crimes; but the indictments should not go too wide as others needed an incentive to
move against Saddam Hussein. Mr Sawers also set out Mr Cook’s idea of a ‘Contract
with the Iraqi People’, in which there was some interest.
219.  On the follow-up to the talks, Mr Sawers suggested:
“… we need to start doing more detailed work on the sanctions aspects … perhaps
we should now produce our own detailed paper on what steps to take … We are
122  Public hearing, 10 December 2009, pages 16-17.
123  Letter Sawers to Cowper-Coles, 24 February 2001, ‘Prime Minister’s Talks with President Bush,
Camp David, 23 February 2001’.
233
Previous page | Contents | Next page