The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
“Given the
demonstrated unpredictability of Saddam Hussein’s regime, it
is
impossible
to make definitive judgements capable of being ascribed [with]
absolute
certainty
when considering what might occur in any given hypothetical
situation. The
recent JIC
paper … [of 13 December 2000] reflects this uncertainty. But we
can,
based on
past experience and informed assessment of the nature of that
regime,
arrive at
assessments to which we attach a high degree of
confidence.”
160.
Mr McKane
repeated the JIC’s Assessment of the risks of withdrawing both
the
southern
and northern NFZs, and added:
“In the
event that UK and US operations in the southern No-Fly Zone were to
cease,
no one can
predict with absolute certainty how Saddam Hussein would act or
what
the
consequences would be for the Shia population. Air power would give
Saddam
more
military options. He used air power, including helicopter gunships,
against
the Shia
population in 1991 and 1992. If the southern No-Fly Zone were
lifted, he
would do so
again. More effective persecution of the Shia would add to their
misery,
and would
risk provoking another cycle of uprising and brutal repression. A
grave
humanitarian
crisis would result …
“In
addition, any judgement on the utility of the southern No-Fly Zone
in preventing
a
humanitarian disaster must take into account the likely impact on
our ability to
prevent one
in the north. We believe that, if UK and US operations in the
southern
No-Fly Zone
were to cease, it would be more difficult to sustain the
necessary
political
support for the northern No-Fly Zone …
“Our
overall judgement remains that there is an unacceptably high risk
that, in the
event that
we cease patrolling the southern No-Fly Zone, extreme
humanitarian
distress
would result on a scale comparable to that which led to grave
humanitarian
crisis and
the establishment of the Zones in 1991 and 1992.
“This
assessment will be kept under review. The judgement it contains
could change
if
alternative arrangements for preventing further humanitarian
catastrophe in Iraq
emerge from
the review of policy … on which we and the US Government are
now
embarked.”
161.
Lord Williams
asked to see earlier drafts of the letter before
responding.91
162.
The
Attorney General concluded that it was still possible on balance to
argue
that the
maintenance of the NFZs was justified, although that argument was
now
more
questionable.
163.
Mr Brummell
replied to Mr McKane on 12 February, setting out Lord
Williams’
views.92
Mr Brummell
reiterated a number of points made in previous
letters.
He also
wrote:
91
Letter
McKane to Cowper-Coles, 6 February 2001, ‘Iraq’.
92
Letter
Brummell to McKane, 12 February 2001, ‘Iraq: No Fly Zones
(NFZs)’.
220