Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
“Given the demonstrated unpredictability of Saddam Hussein’s regime, it is
impossible to make definitive judgements capable of being ascribed [with] absolute
certainty when considering what might occur in any given hypothetical situation. The
recent JIC paper … [of 13 December 2000] reflects this uncertainty. But we can,
based on past experience and informed assessment of the nature of that regime,
arrive at assessments to which we attach a high degree of confidence.”
160.  Mr McKane repeated the JIC’s Assessment of the risks of withdrawing both the
southern and northern NFZs, and added:
“In the event that UK and US operations in the southern No-Fly Zone were to cease,
no one can predict with absolute certainty how Saddam Hussein would act or what
the consequences would be for the Shia population. Air power would give Saddam
more military options. He used air power, including helicopter gunships, against
the Shia population in 1991 and 1992. If the southern No-Fly Zone were lifted, he
would do so again. More effective persecution of the Shia would add to their misery,
and would risk provoking another cycle of uprising and brutal repression. A grave
humanitarian crisis would result …
“In addition, any judgement on the utility of the southern No-Fly Zone in preventing
a humanitarian disaster must take into account the likely impact on our ability to
prevent one in the north. We believe that, if UK and US operations in the southern
No-Fly Zone were to cease, it would be more difficult to sustain the necessary
political support for the northern No-Fly Zone …
“Our overall judgement remains that there is an unacceptably high risk that, in the
event that we cease patrolling the southern No-Fly Zone, extreme humanitarian
distress would result on a scale comparable to that which led to grave humanitarian
crisis and the establishment of the Zones in 1991 and 1992.
“This assessment will be kept under review. The judgement it contains could change
if alternative arrangements for preventing further humanitarian catastrophe in Iraq
emerge from the review of policy … on which we and the US Government are now
embarked.”
161.  Lord Williams asked to see earlier drafts of the letter before responding.91
162.  The Attorney General concluded that it was still possible on balance to argue
that the maintenance of the NFZs was justified, although that argument was now
more questionable.
163.  Mr Brummell replied to Mr McKane on 12 February, setting out Lord Williams’
views.92 Mr Brummell reiterated a number of points made in previous letters.
He also wrote:
91  Letter McKane to Cowper-Coles, 6 February 2001, ‘Iraq’.
92  Letter Brummell to McKane, 12 February 2001, ‘Iraq: No Fly Zones (NFZs)’.
220
Previous page | Contents | Next page