Previous page | Contents | Next page
12.1  |  Security Sector Reform
trained Division. Our main focus will be to help resolve the following concerns: a
lack of situational awareness; a lack of clear command and control; poor planning;
and an inability to co‑ordinate effectively with coalition assets and experience, in
particular with regards to calling on coalition forces for fire support and in extremis
extraction when these can only be delivered within coalition rules of engagement.”
1466.  On presentation, the official wrote that there were “many potential positives” but
it would be likely to raise questions about whether the UK handed Basra over to PIC too
early “and whether we have acted too late and only under pressure”.
1467.  The total number of military personnel involved was 150.
1468.  In Mr Browne’s absence, Mr Adam Ingram, the Minister for Armed Forces,
considered the advice on 3 April.1341 Mr Ingram noted the advice and “emphasised the
need to ensure that personnel are clearly briefed on the red lines beyond which they
must not operate and the action to be taken in the event such lines are crossed”. He
“also asked that any evidence of behaviour by Iraqi forces with which UK personnel
had concerns be reported rapidly to Ministers”.
1469.  A note for Mr Browne was written on Mr Ingram’s response by Mr Browne’s
Private Secretary the same day.1342 He reported that MiTTs were now deployed in Basra.
He wrote:
“… It wasn’t so long ago that MiTTs/OMLTs [Operational Mentoring Liaison Teams]
in Iraq were thought to be a bad idea, but then, the situation has definitely changed
in the last week or so …
“Everyone appears to be content that the legal position is robust, but there are
clearly presentational risks in being seen to be drawn into town, while Warrior
back in Basra will not go unnoticed. It means 58 additional people will be
deployed but they’re temporary and will be invisible – we’re still at ‘around 4,000’
established posts.”
1470.  Maj Gen White‑Spunner reported on 3 April that US MiTTs and the
“accompanying military resources they bring” were having a “significant supporting
impact” to those Iraqi forces.1343
1471.  On 4 April, Mr Jon Day, MOD Director General Operational Policy, advised
Ms Aldred that there were over 400 US troops embedded with the Iraqi reinforcements
sent to Basra in support of Charge of the Knights.1344
1341  Minute PS/Min(AF) to PJHQ [junior official], 3 April 2008, ‘Op TELIC: Enhancing UK Operational
Support to the Iraqi Army’.
1342  Manuscript comment PS/SofS [MOD] on Minute PS/Min(AF) to PJHQ [junior official], 3 April 2008,
‘Op TELIC: Enhancing UK Operational Support to the Iraqi Army’.
1343  Minute White‑Spunner to CJO, 3 April 2008, ‘GOC MND(SE) Weekly Letter – 3 April 2008’.
1344  Letter Day to Aldred, 4 April 2008, ‘Military Plans for Basra’.
395
Previous page | Contents | Next page