10.3 |
Reconstruction: oil, commercial interests, debt relief, asylum and
stabilisation policy
right
approach, bearing in mind the UK was making the case that the
conflict was about
WMD and not
oil:
“But the
pressure from businesses is building and I fear that some of our
business
community
fear we are not engaged. Some think that the US and France are
ahead
of the game
already …”
603.
Baroness
Symons concluded that she felt strongly that the time was right “to
be
more on the
front foot”.
604.
At the end of
February, Mr Keith Allan, TPUK Deputy Director
International
Group 1,
reported to TPUK colleagues that Mr Dominick Chilcott, the
Head of the IPU,
had told
him that there was scope for a “TPUK slot” in the US Office of
Reconstruction
and
Humanitarian Assistance (ORHA).352
The US
needed more resources in ORHA
and
Mr Chilcott believed that ORHA would welcome someone who could
make a
substantive
contribution. Mr Chilcott had made it clear that the
individual would need to
do
“a real job”.
“We see
this as a key opportunity for UK plc. As Dominick [Chilcott] said,
there
would be no
guarantees of contracts, but it would be a clear demonstration of
our
commitment
to do our best for UK companies.”
606.
A junior
official in British Trade International (BTI) joined ORHA (then
based
in
Washington) on 9 March. He subsequently deployed with ORHA to
Kuwait and
607.
On 8 March,
the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), which had
responsibility
within the
US Government for the reconstruction of the oil sector, awarded a
contract
for the
repair of Iraq’s oil infrastructure, worth up to US$7bn, to
KBR.354
Hard
Lessons
reported
that the contract was the single largest reconstruction contract in
Iraq and the
largest
known sole-source contract in US history.
608.
Mr Brenton
reported on 10 March that “a commercial contact” had passed
the
British
Embassy Washington a version of a USAID invitation to select US
companies to
bid for a
US$600m contract for infrastructure reconstruction.355
USAID had
confirmed
that it had
issued the invitation on 12 February with a closing date of 27
February.
Mr Brenton
had pressed for more transparency.
352
Email Allan
to Warren, 27 February 2003, ‘Iraq: TPUK Position in US Office of
Reconstruction and
Humanitarian
Assistance (ORHA)’.
353
Email BTI
[junior official] to Henderson, 13 June 2003, ‘End of assignment to
OCPA and replacement
planning’.
354
Bowen SW
Jr. Hard
Lessons: The Iraq Reconstruction Experience. U.S.
Government Printing
Office,
2009.
355
Telegram
320 Washington to FCO London, 10 March 2003, ‘Iraq Day After:
Infrastructure
Reconstruction
Contracts’.
465