Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
26.  Telegrams to and from individual posts were numbered sequentially through the
calendar year, starting with “TELNO 1” on 1 January.
27.  All telegrams included a date time group using Greenwich Mean Time (GMT).
A telegram from the British Embassy Washington sent on “170356Z JULY 03” refers to
a telegram sent at 3.56am GMT on 17 July 2003 (11.56pm on 16 July in Washington;
4.56am on 17 July in London).
28.  A precedence marking signified the urgency of the telegram. “FLASH” indicated
a telegram to be seen immediately by the recipient. A telegram marked “DESKBY
170600Z” was to be available to the recipient at 6.00am GMT. The other designations
were “IMMEDIATE”, “PRIORITY” and “ROUTINE”.
29.  The FCO phased out telegrams during 2005. They were replaced by eGrams.
FCO eGrams
30.  The eGram, which replaced FCO telegrams during 2005, was used for significant
communications and formed part of the FCO official record. It offered much of the
flexibility of an email, including the ability to add attachments.
31.  Unlike telegrams, each eGram was assigned a unique number in a single FCO-wide
sequence starting at midnight GMT on 31 December. Paris eGram 127/06 to the FCO
was not the 127th eGram from Paris, but the 127th eGram sent on the system in 2006.
FCO teleletters
32.  Letters between named individuals sent electronically using the FCO telegram
system. Phased out in 2005.
Valedictories
33.  Reports from officials at the end of a tour of duty as the head of an overseas post.
Hauldown reports
34.  Valedictories sent by UK military commanders at the end of a tour of duty in Iraq.
Private Secretary letters
35.  Routine formal communication between government departments is often
conducted by means of a letter from one Ministerial Private Secretary to another. Such
letters should be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Minister, not of the signatory.
The importance of an issue can often be inferred from the seniority of the Private
Secretary. For instance, a letter from one Principal Private Secretary to another would
usually hold more weight than a letter from one junior Minister’s Private Secretary
to another.
328
Previous page | Contents | Next page