Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
521.  The British Embassy Baghdad produced a “core script” setting out the UK’s
response to the draft Hydrocarbons Law on 7 November.298 Key messages for the UK
to relay to Iraqi contacts included:
It was crucial that an agreed national law was passed soon, given the
importance of oil to national economic and security interests.
The Iraqi Constitution stated that oil resources belonged to all Iraqi citizens.
The federal Government was best placed to ensure that those resources were
developed to the maximum benefit for all Iraqi citizens.
A national law should be agreed before the KRG passed a regional law.
522.  UK officials continued to meet regularly with Ministers and senior officials
in the Iraqi Government and the KRG to discuss progress towards agreeing a
Hydrocarbon Law.
523.  The IPU provided Dr Howells with an update on negotiations on a Hydrocarbons
Law on 14 February 2007.299 While there was not yet any agreement, there was a
“strong impetus to achieve consensus”. President Bush had indentified the passing of
the Hydrocarbons Law as a key indicator of progress in Iraq. The US Ambassador was
working hard to bring the key players together. The UK had “remained in close touch
with the key negotiators … in support”.
524.  The update advised that the latest draft Hydrocarbons Law addressed only two
of the four principles which the UK had defined in September 2006 (it would establish
a national public-sector oil company and contained helpful clauses on transparency).
525.  The update proposed that, while the UK’s influence was “limited”, it should,
alongside the US, continue to lobby key Iraqi players, and encourage the IMF and
World Bank to play an active role in providing assistance and advice on the more
technical aspects of the negotiations.
526.  Dr Howells accepted that proposal, and agreed that the UK’s influence was
limited.300
527.  Mr Asquith reported from Baghdad in May that disagreements continued over
the extent of regional authority in the oil sector and on the implications of foreign
investment.301 He commented:
“The political mood makes quick passage of the HCL [Hydrocarbons Law] unlikely.
Differences between the Kurds and Baghdad go beyond simple posturing, with
Kurdish hardball tactics generating worrying anti-Kurdish sentiment among Arab
politicians. Resolution by the summer would be an achievement.” 
298 Email FCO [junior official] to IPU [junior official], 7 November 2006, ‘HCL – Core Script’.
299 Minute IPU [junior official] to PS/Dr Howells, 14 February 2007, ‘Iraq: Hydrocarbons Law Update’.
300 Email APS/Howells [FCO] to junior official [IPU], 19 February 2007, ‘Iraq: Hydrocarbons Law Update’.
301 eGram 20342/07 Baghdad to FCO London, 14 May 2007, ‘Iraq: Update on the Hydrocarbons Law’.
452
Previous page | Contents | Next page