Previous page | Contents | Next page
10.3  |  Reconstruction: oil, commercial interests, debt relief, asylum and stabilisation policy
Government, prompted the UK Government to consider what it would be able to do if
a UK company did the same.273
473.  Mr Dominic Asquith, FCO Director Iraq, advised officials on 6 December that, in
dealing with previous approaches from UK companies, he had said that:
any contract must be with the explicit agreement of the Iraqi Government;
any contract must have the support of the KRG, rather than any one element
of it;
even then, the legal position would be “fragile”; and
“so wait until things become clearer”.274
474.  FCO and IPU officials agreed that those lines were appropriate.275
475.  Mr William Patey, British Ambassador to Iraq, reported on 13 December 2005 that:
“Oil is the critical factor in Iraq’s economic revival. Increased revenue in 2006
will depend on a continued programme of rehabilitation of current wells and
infrastructure and, more importantly, improved security in the north.
Serious increases will require more radical surgery. The new Government will need
to focus quickly on commercialising the oil industry and a legislative framework to
attract investment. The future will be complicated by discussions on constitutional
provisions.”276
476.  The pace of rehabilitation was slow. The Ministry of Oil spent less than 10 percent
of its annual capital investment budget of US$3bn (the money was used instead to pay
for additional subsidised fuel imports).
477.  There were rumours that a number of draft Petroleum Laws existed, but no one
had seen them. The provisions in the Constitution on oil were unclear; ownership of
the oil and how it should be managed would need to be clarified by the Constitutional
Committee.
478.  In its dialogue with potential Prime Ministers, the Embassy had emphasised:
the importance of “getting the oil sector right” and of increasing production;
the need for greater World Bank involvement in the sector, which would give
access to additional financing on good terms and policy advice; and
273 Email Asquith to FCO [junior official], 30 November 2005, ‘Norwegian oil deal with Kurds angers Iraq’s
Sunnis’.
274 Email Asquith to DTI [junior official], 6 December 2005, ‘Norwegian oil deal with Kurds angers Iraq’s
Sunnis’.
275 Email IPU [junior official] to Asquith, 7 December 2005, ‘Norwegian oil deal with Kurds angers Iraq’s
Sunnis’.
276 eGram 20655/05 Baghdad to FCO London, 13 December 2005, ‘Iraq: Oil’.
445
Previous page | Contents | Next page