6.5 |
Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, January to
March 2003
top
priority for the British Government and various trade-offs had to
be made and
someone had
to make them on a day-to-day basis for the Prime
Minister.”580
1346.
Mr Chilcott
warned against being “dazzled” by the IPU’s late creation: “a lot
of
the work
that the IPU was able to bring together in a more intense
atmosphere had
been going
on for some time”.581
But he did
accept that the IPU could have been set
up sooner:
“… one of
the lessons is obviously you can’t begin this sort of thinking too
early,
and although
we did begin serious thinking about the day after in the
preceding
October …
we could have created the IPU earlier. We could have had a
greater
sense of
the reality of what we were doing.”582
1347.
A number of
witnesses commented on the Government’s focus on
humanitarian
preparations at the expense of other post-conflict
issues.
1348.
In his
statement to the Inquiry, Mr Blair wrote:
“The
over-riding concern was the humanitarian fall-out from conflict,
together with
the
potential damage, from firing oil wells to the environment and WMD
attacks.”583
1349.
Mr Straw
told the Inquiry:
“… we had
anticipated the problem of a humanitarian crisis sufficiently well
that, on
the whole,
we were able to avoid that, which was good. What we had not
anticipated
was the
extent of the inefficacy of ORHA …”584
1350.
Lord Turnbull
told the Inquiry that, although the UK prepared for the worst case
on
the
humanitarian front, it failed to anticipate the collapse of civil
order: “The real problem
was
security and we probably spent too much time on humanitarian … if
we didn’t
establish
security, nothing else counted for anything.”585
1351.
Similarly,
Lord Boyce stated:
“First of
all, we recognised there could very well be a humanitarian problem
… and
a lot of
our focus was I think at the humanitarian level rather than the
governance of
the
country, in other words, picking up the point about law and order
and so forth …
“I think
that we probably took too narrow a view about what might be
required in the
aftermath
in terms of the governance aspects of life.”586
580
Public
hearing, 8 December 2009, page 56.
581
Public
hearing, 8 December 2009, pages 17-18.
582
Public
hearing, 8 December 2009, pages 47-48.
583
Statement,
14 January 2011, page 13.
584
Public
hearing, 8 February 2010, page 111.
585
Public
hearing, 13 January 2010, page 39.
586
Public
hearing, 27 January 2011, pages 67-68.
549