Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
in Baghdad) are ahead of us on this, and are taking a much more open stance”.311
He recommended to Baroness Symons that she agree a “more open, pro-active
approach” to dealing with UK companies.
710.  Baroness Symons sent that advice to Mr Straw and Ms Patricia Hewitt, Secretary
of State for Trade and Industry, stating that:
“… the pressure from businesses is building and I fear that some of our business
community fear we are not engaged. Some think that the US and France are ahead
of the game already …”312
711.  Government lobbying on behalf of UK firms is addressed in more detail in
Section 10.3.
The UK ‘Vision for Iraq and the Iraqi People’
712.  The UK ‘Vision for Iraq and the Iraqi People’, written by the FCO in October
2002, was revised at the end of February 2003.
713.  Mr Straw saw its principal value as a means to reassure domestic and Iraqi
public opinion of the UK’s intentions in Iraq.
714.  The ‘Vision’ was a statement of aspirations that assumed a level of
agreement with the US that did not yet exist on plans for post-conflict Iraq.
715.  The ‘Vision for Iraq and the Iraqi People’ was a separate document to the ‘UK
Vision for Phase IV’, which is addressed earlier in this Section.
716.  On 27 February, Mr Straw discussed the draft ‘Vision for Iraq and the Iraqi
People’, originally prepared by FCO officials in October 2002 (see Section 6.4), with
Mr Campbell.313 The draft had been shown to the AHGI on 11 October 2002, when it had
been decided that the paper should “remain in reserve”.314
717.  Mr Straw believed that “public commitment on the lines of the draft could have
a powerful impact in Iraq and the region as well as on the British domestic debate”.
The ‘Vision’ should not be launched or trailed until the UN had voted on the second
resolution because of the risk that it would be presented as “discounting” the role of the
Security Council. Care would also be needed to avoid confusing the message that the
justification for military action rested firmly on disarmament of WMD.
718.  Mr Straw thought it essential that the UK, US and “other Coalition members” spoke
to a common script. That underlined the importance of making progress with the US on
311 Minute Henderson to Symons, 27 February 2003, ‘Iraq contingency planning: commercial aspects’.
312 Minute Symons to Straw and Hewitt, undated, ‘Iraq: Commercial Aspects’.
313 Letter Owen to Rycroft, 28 February 2003, ‘A Vision for Iraq and the Iraqi People’ attaching
Paper [unattributed and undated], ‘A Vision for Iraq and the Iraqi People’.
314 Minute Dodd to Manning, 14 October 2002, ‘Ad Hoc Group on Iraq’; Paper [draft] FCO, [undated],
‘Vision for Iraq and the Iraqi People’.
440
Previous page | Contents | Next page