Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
Introduction and key findings
1.  This Section addresses:
the arrangements made to provide equipment to forces deploying for operations
in Iraq;
difficulties in the provision of Combat Identification (Combat ID), ammunition,
Enhanced Combat Body Armour (ECBA), desert clothing, and equipment to
protect against a chemical or biological attack; and
asset tracking.
2.  This Section does not address:
the UK’s military planning for the invasion of Iraq, which is addressed in Sections
6.1 and 6.2;
the background to decisions made by the Treasury on equipment and Urgent
Operational Requirement (UOR) funding, which is described in Section 13.1;
and
assessments of Iraq’s capabilities and intent. Intelligence assessments relevant
to military planning are addressed in Section 6.2 and the UK’s assessment of
Iraq’s WMD programmes in Sections 4.1 to 4.4.
Key findings
The decisions taken between mid-December 2002 and mid-January 2003 to increase
combat forces and bring forward the date on which UK forces might participate in
combat operations compressed the timescales available for preparation.
The achievements made in preparing the forces in the time available were very
considerable, but the deployment of forces more quickly than anticipated in the
Defence Planning Assumptions meant that there were some serious equipment
shortfalls when conflict began.
Those shortfalls were exacerbated by the lack of an effective asset tracking system,
a lesson from previous operations and exercises that the Ministry of Defence (MOD)
had identified but not adequately addressed.
Ministers were not fully aware of the risks inherent in the decisions and the MOD and
Permanent Joint Headquarters (PJHQ) were not fully aware of the situation on the
ground during the conflict.
Planning and readiness for expeditionary operations
3.  The Armed Forces’ capacity to deploy and sustain expeditionary operations
was determined by decisions in the 1998 Strategic Defence Review (SDR).
4.  The SDR identified a major regional crisis, including in the Gulf, as the most
demanding scenario against which the UK should plan for military operations.
2
Previous page | Contents | Next page