Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.2  |  Military planning for the invasion, January to March 2003
Parties to the 1954 Hague Convention agree:
to make provision in times of peace for the protection of cultural property from
the foreseeable effects of armed conflict;
“to respect cultural property situated within their own territory as well as within
the territory of other [parties to the Convention] by refraining from any use of the
property and its immediate surroundings for purposes which are likely to expose
it to destruction or damage in the event of armed conflict; and by refraining from
any act of hostility directed against such property.
The 1954 Hague Convention imposes explicit obligations on Occupying Powers to support
“competent national authorities” of an occupied country to safeguard and preserve its
cultural property and where those competent national authorities are unable to do so,
to take “as far as possible, and in close cooperation with those authorities, the most
necessary measures of preservation”.
The First Protocol to the 1954 Hague Convention, also agreed in 1954, contains
provisions banning the export of cultural property from occupied territory and requiring the
restitution of such property removed in contravention of the terms of the Convention.
The Second Protocol to the Convention contains further reinforcing provisions:
Article 9 imposes, without prejudice to the provisions of the Convention, an
express obligation to prohibit and prevent any illicit export or other removal or
transfer of cultural property or unauthorised excavation of it;
Article 15, includes provisions requiring parties to the Convention to impose
criminal sanctions on persons who, in violation of the Convention and the Protocol,
make cultural property the object of attack, use cultural property in support of
military action, or cause extensive damage to, vandalise, or steal such property.
The 1954 Hague Convention and the First Protocol, according to their terms, entered into
force on 7 August 1956. The Second Protocol entered into force in on 9 March 2004.
The UK, US and Iraq signed the Convention in 1954. Iraq ratified the treaty in 1967: the
US in 2009. The UK has not, to date, ratified the Convention or the First Protocol and it
has not signed the Second Protocol.
In 1998 the UK signed, and in 2002, ratified the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means
of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of
Cultural Property.
Parties to the 1970 UNESCO Convention agree to outlaw and take measures to prevent
the unlawful import, export or transfer of ownership of cultural property.
On 30 December 2003, the UK enacted the Dealing in Cultural Objects (Offences) Act
2003, which made it an offence for any person to dishonestly deal in a cultural object
‘tainted’ as defined in the Act.
Under the terms of the Act, a cultural object is “tainted” if its removal or excavation from
a building, structure or monument of historical, architectural or archaeological interest,
(including any site comprising the remains of a building, structure or of any work, cave or
excavation) constituted an offence under the law of the UK or any other country or territory.
517
Previous page | Contents | Next page