The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
have known
before the following week that what the Armed Services and the
Civil
Service
expect was not what had been the precedent given in the past that
they
wanted
more, they wanted an unequivocal answer. Had I known that, then I
would
have
approached the question differently, and I’m simply saying that I
was cautious
in not
going further than I needed to do on 7 March.”286
709.
Asked whether
the difficulties in the Security Council had made it more
important
to know if
there was a sufficient legal basis for military action, Lord
Goldsmith replied:
710.
Asked whether
Mr Blair had asked him to come up with a definitive
position,
Lord Goldsmith
told the Inquiry:
“I don’t
recall it that way. The way it may have been seen by others or
interpreted
by others
or recollected by others, I don’t know, but I don’t recall the
Prime Minister
asking for
that, no, definitely not.”288
711.
Asked whether
the huge pressure on the Government, including
Mr Blair’s
personal
future, had weighed on him, Lord Goldsmith said:
“The
consequences for the Government did not … What did matter to me, of
course,
was the
United Kingdom as a country and the people that we would have
been
asking to
take part in this with a potential personal responsibility, and I
did believe
it was
right to respond to the request from the head of the Armed Services
… That
712.
Asked whether
the possibility of troops who had been deployed to the area
being
withdrawn
as a consequence of his advice weighed upon him Lord Goldsmith
said:
“No. Those
sorts of consequences are not what the lawyer has to take into
account.
What the
lawyer has to do is to weigh up the arguments and evidence
carefully
and reach
what he believes is the correct legal view, whatever the
consequences
713.
The Inquiry
asked Mr Blair what discussions he or others under his
instruction had
with Lord
Goldsmith between 7 March, when he had received Lord Goldsmith’s
formal
advice, and
13 March. Mr Blair said:
“I can’t
recall any specific discussions that I had. I don’t know whether
others would
have had
with him before 13 March, but essentially what happened was this:
he
gave legal
advice, he gave an opinion saying, ‘Look, there is this argument
against
it, there
is this argument for it. I think a reasonable case can be made’ and
obviously
286
Public
hearing, 27 January 2010, page 173.
287
Public
hearing, 27 January 2010, page 187.
288
Public
hearing, 27 January 2010, page 189.
289
Public
hearing, 27 January 2010, pages 190-191.
290
Public
hearing, 27 January 2010, page 191.
128