Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
have known before the following week that what the Armed Services and the Civil
Service expect was not what had been the precedent given in the past that they
wanted more, they wanted an unequivocal answer. Had I known that, then I would
have approached the question differently, and I’m simply saying that I was cautious
in not going further than I needed to do on 7 March.”286
709.  Asked whether the difficulties in the Security Council had made it more important
to know if there was a sufficient legal basis for military action, Lord Goldsmith replied:
“Yes.”287
710.  Asked whether Mr Blair had asked him to come up with a definitive position,
Lord Goldsmith told the Inquiry:
“I don’t recall it that way. The way it may have been seen by others or interpreted
by others or recollected by others, I don’t know, but I don’t recall the Prime Minister
asking for that, no, definitely not.”288
711.  Asked whether the huge pressure on the Government, including Mr Blair’s
personal future, had weighed on him, Lord Goldsmith said:
“The consequences for the Government did not … What did matter to me, of course,
was the United Kingdom as a country and the people that we would have been
asking to take part in this with a potential personal responsibility, and I did believe
it was right to respond to the request from the head of the Armed Services … That
weighed with me.”289
712.  Asked whether the possibility of troops who had been deployed to the area being
withdrawn as a consequence of his advice weighed upon him Lord Goldsmith said:
“No. Those sorts of consequences are not what the lawyer has to take into account.
What the lawyer has to do is to weigh up the arguments and evidence carefully
and reach what he believes is the correct legal view, whatever the consequences
may be.”290
713.  The Inquiry asked Mr Blair what discussions he or others under his instruction had
with Lord Goldsmith between 7 March, when he had received Lord Goldsmith’s formal
advice, and 13 March. Mr Blair said:
“I can’t recall any specific discussions that I had. I don’t know whether others would
have had with him before 13 March, but essentially what happened was this: he
gave legal advice, he gave an opinion saying, ‘Look, there is this argument against
it, there is this argument for it. I think a reasonable case can be made’ and obviously
286 Public hearing, 27 January 2010, page 173.
287 Public hearing, 27 January 2010, page 187.
288 Public hearing, 27 January 2010, page 189.
289 Public hearing, 27 January 2010, pages 190-191.
290 Public hearing, 27 January 2010, page 191.
128
Previous page | Contents | Next page