Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
“Therefore, though the ISG have not found evidence of actual weapons, they have
found evidence of programmes. Any of this would have triggered a justification for
conflict.
“Dr Kay has said:
He believes no major new production of weapons occurred post-1991.
He speculates that Saddam may have been told tales about the
programmes or that some stuff moved to Syria.
But some old stockpiles may well exist and the capabilities and
determination remained intact.
That Iraq was ‘a very dangerous place’.
That the conflict was justified, and
That the US/UK did not interfere with the intelligence.
“He makes a claim also that Saddam was trying to manufacture ricin up to the last
minute … but UK services at least don’t seem to know the provenance of this.
“(d) however, in view of the fact that we certainly thought production of new weapons
was continuing and it may be that it wasn’t, it is sensible to learn the intelligence
lessons.
“Therefore, the US is going to have a Commission of Experts look into it.
“The UK will refer the issue back to the Intelligence and Security Committee …
“Meanwhile the ISG will continue its work on the ground since there are at least
26 million pages of documents and many unvisited sites still to follow up.”
647.  On the wider threat from WMD, Mr Blair wrote:
“Whatever the intelligence from Iraq, let us be in no doubt about the threat.
“The threat of terrorism and proliferation of WMD continues. It would be disastrous if
doubts about the strength of intelligence in Iraq blinded us to the danger. We know
that Iran and North Korea are trying to develop nuclear weapons and it is only since
Iraq that real pressure on them has started to pay off.
“We now know that Libya was far closer then we thought to nuclear capability and on
CW than we thought; and, since Iraq they are working with us to eliminate it …”
648.  Mr Blair concluded:
“If we have to accept that some of the Iraq intelligence was wrong, we will do so.
But let us not either (a) lurch to the opposite extreme and start pretending Iraq
had nothing; or (b) let any intelligence inaccuracy move us off confronting the
WMD issue.
552
Previous page | Contents | Next page