The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
“The
problem was … that … this was a highly autocratic state, where
almost
everybody
revolved around the person, the thinking the behaviour and whims of
the
leader. So
it was what was going on in his mind which was critical, and that
was very
difficult
to fathom. And by his [Saddam Hussein’s] nature such a society
generates,
deliberately
or not, obfuscation and uncertainty. Nobody quite knows what
about
what. There
is a great deal of uncertainty of knowledge.
“So an
individual, maybe a very senior military or civilian commander who
you would
normally
expect to have quite a confident view of a particular issue or
capability …
might not …
might say … I don’t know about this, but … a friend who does …
tells
me … and
you wouldn’t really know whether that was true or
not.”268
655.
Sir John
subsequently told the Inquiry:
“… taken
overall, I think as of mid-March 2003 … I think we said five lines
[of
HUMINT] by
that stage … [T]hat was a general statement which we were given
by
the agency
[SIS]. It wasn’t something that reflected research and real
knowledge on
656.
SIS1 told the
Inquiry:
“I think
there was a sense in Iraq where the leader wished to convey to a
fearful
regime and
the people that he was powerful, that he had things up his sleeve,
and
that those
who were responsible for various programmes wanted to convince
the
leader that
work was continuing and that there were capabilities. It was not a
well
organised
place. It was extremely repressive.
…
“And it was
corrupt. So people told people up and down what they wanted to
hear,
and things
which suited their ends.”270
657.
The Inquiry
asked SIS1 whether SIS sources and Iraqis in direct contact,
for
example,
with the UN and Sir Jeremy Greenstock, who were saying, “we don’t
have
anything”,
were telling the truth as they knew it then, or whether he thought
some of
them did
suspect they had something but that was the party line. SIS1
replied:
“Many of
them believed they had it, and in a way that was part of the
picture that we
658.
Asked whether
he thought there were any lessons, SIS1 observed, “we based a
lot
268
Public
hearing, 8 December 2009, pages 32-33.
269
Private
hearing, 5 June 2010, page 31.
270
Private
hearing, 2010, pages 57-58.
271
Private
hearing, 2010, page 58.
272
Private
hearing, 2010, page 82.
408