Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.3  |  Iraq WMD assessments, October 2002 to March 2003
“deemed too dangerous”. Eight intact bombs had been unearthed, two of which
had a “liquid fill”. That “should be followed by a serious and credible effort to
determine” how many R-400 bombs had been produced.
Iraq had informed UNMOVIC that there would be further legislation on
prohibiting work on weapons of mass destruction.
419.  Dr ElBaradei reported that there were no indications that Iraq had resumed
nuclear activities since the inspectors left in December 1998 and the recently
increased level of Iraqi co-operation should allow the IAEA to provide the Security
Council with an assessment of Iraq’s nuclear capabilities in the near future.
420.  Dr ElBaradei reported that the IAEA was focused on the “central question”
of “whether Iraq has revived, or attempted to revive, its defunct nuclear weapons
programme over the last four years”.158 Dr ElBaradei noted that:
“… in the past three weeks, possibly as a result of ever-increasing pressure by the
international community, Iraq has been forthcoming in its co-operation, particularly
with regard to the conduct of private interviews and in making available evidence
that could contribute to the resolution of matters of IAEA concern.”
421.  That “should enable” the IAEA “in the very near future to provide the Security
Council with an objective and thorough assessment of Iraq’s nuclear-related
capabilities”.
422.  Iraq’s industrial capacity had deteriorated sharply, including through the departure
of foreign support present in the 1980s and large numbers of skilled Iraqi personnel in
the preceding decade.
423.  Interviews were continuing, including two “private interviews in the last 10 days”.
Interviews outside Iraq might be the best way to ensure that interviews were “free”, and
the IAEA intended to request such interviews “shortly”.
424.  The primary technical focus of the IAEA in the field had been on the possible
resumption of Iraq’s efforts to enrich uranium. In relation to the three key issues,
the IAEA had:
Failed to uncover any evidence that Iraq’s attempts to purchase high strength
aluminium tubes was for “any project other than … rockets”. The documents
provided and interviews had allowed the IAEA “to develop a coherent picture of
attempted purchases and intended usage”.
Verified that none of the magnets Iraq had declared could be used directly
for the magnetic bearings in centrifuges. It was likely that Iraq possessed the
expertise to manufacture such magnets and the IAEA would continue to monitor
and inspect equipment and materials.
158  UN Security Council, ‘4714th Meeting Friday 7 March 2003’ (S/PV.4714).
367
Previous page | Contents | Next page