Previous page | Contents | Next page
10.1  |  Reconstruction: March 2003 to June 2004
And by helping Iraqis draft a modern, liberal constitution, the CPA gave the Iraqi
people the political structure to define a path to representative government …”647
Sir Hilary Synnott’s assessment
1104.  Mr Blair told the Inquiry that, although anxiety and concern were occasionally
flagged up very strongly in Sir Hilary’s reports from Basra, when Sir Hilary left Iraq at the
end of January 2004, he was, on balance, optimistic rather than pessimistic.648
1105.  In response, Sir Hilary wrote to the Inquiry to clarify that his judgement that “the
balance of probability is positive” had referred only to southern Iraq, the region for which
he had some responsibility, not to the country as a whole, about which he was in no
position to make such an assessment.649
1106.  Sir Hilary also emphasised that his judgement should be viewed in the context of
the recommendation he put forward at the time, including at his meeting with Mr Blair
in February 2004, that maintaining momentum in CPA(South) could best be achieved
by retaining a multinational development presence in the South, able to draw on the
expertise, contacts and trust built up during the CPA period. However:
“In the event, my strategy was not accepted. The international team, who included
a large number of British specialists, was disbanded. While DFID managed a small
number of British-owned projects, the vast majority of the projects which were being
pursued by the CPA failed, as I had feared.
“I would not suggest that the alternative approach such as I had proposed would
have prevented the subsequent build-up of violence. But it is possible that the
attitudes of the people of the South would have been more positive if they had
experienced the benefits of the projects as they came on stream … Had I known that
the civilian capital, experience and impetus built up over the previous year would be
allowed to fall away … I would no doubt have offered a different judgement.”
Resources available for reconstruction
1107.  At least US$19.4bn was spent on the relief and reconstruction of Iraq during the
Occupation. Of that, US$16.4bn – almost 85 percent – was Iraqi funding.
1108.  The US General Accounting Office (GAO) estimated in June 2004 that as
at the end of April 2004, approximately US$58.3bn had been pledged “to the relief
and reconstruction of Iraq”, of which at least US$23.7bn had been obligated (subject
to a binding agreement that would result in immediate or future outlay of funds)
647  Statement, 18 May 2010, page 5.
648  Public hearing, 21 January 2011, page 135.
649  Letter Synnott to Aldred, 24 January 2011, [untitled].
191
Previous page | Contents | Next page