Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
1070.  The resolution also requested Member States, international financial institutions
and other organisations to strengthen their efforts to support reconstruction and
development.
1071.  A Treasury official advised Mr Brown and Mr Boateng that the resolution
had significant implications for Iraq’s development.630 To maintain transparency in
the management of oil revenues, the resolution provided for the continuation of the
DFI under the control of the Iraqi Government. At the UK’s request, the resolution
explicitly mentioned transparency and provided that DFI funds could only be spent
through Iraq’s budget.
1072.  The IAMB would continue to monitor oil sales and provide an external audit
function, and would include an additional member designated by the Government of Iraq.
1073.  Oil revenues held in the DFI would continue to enjoy immunity from attachment.
The UK had pressed unsuccessfully to extend that immunity to foreign exchange
reserves held in the Central Bank of Iraq.
1074.  The resolution recognised the IIG’s authority to conclude and implement loan
agreements and other financial assistance and arrangements. That should enable the
IGI to negotiate and agree an IMF programme and conclude a Paris Club debt deal.
1075.  The resolution called for IFIs to engage fully in assisting reconstruction and
development. Since the bombing of the UN Headquarters in Baghdad in August
2003, they had provided technical assistance through seminars outside Iraq and by
commenting on draft economic legislation and the management of donor funds. That
was no substitute for working in country; the UK would continue to press them to return
as soon as possible.
1076.  The official also advised that the Financial Management Law signed by
Ambassador Bremer on 5 June was “a key piece of economic legislation” that regulated
the preparation and execution of Iraq’s budget. UK Treasury officials had been
extensively involved in its drafting.
1077.  The 17 June meeting of the AHMGIR considered DFID’s second paper on funding
reconstruction in the South after transition.631 It was more detailed and less reassuring
than the paper considered by ISOG on 19 May.
1078.  In the paper, DFID assessed that the first few months after transition would be a
critical period for establishing stability under new Iraqi structures, building credibility in
the political process, and maintaining consent for multinational military forces after the
end of Occupation.632 The quality of the provision of basic services – particularly water,
630  Minute Treasury [junior official] to Chancellor, 10 June 2004, ‘Iraq – UNSCR 1546 and Financial
Management Law’.
631  Minutes, 17 June 2004, Ad Hoc Group on Iraq Rehabilitation meeting.
632  Paper DFID, June 2004, ‘Southern Iraq: Reconstruction and Employment After 30 June’.
186
Previous page | Contents | Next page