Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.8  |  Development of UK strategy and options, 8 to 20 March 2003
568.  Sir Jeremy commented that the process had “ground to a halt” because the text
leaked and the leaked version did not resemble the final draft and because President
Lagos had spoken out too soon, “alerting the US who then put on great pressure to kill
it”. A Chilean official had told the UK Mission that the US pressure on Chile in particular
had been “more … than that put on them to support the UK/US/Spain resolution”.
569.  When the EU Heads of Mission met to take stock on 14 March, Sir Jeremy
Greenstock told them “discussions were continuing” and he had made clear to the
African and Latin American members of the Council that he was “ready to talk at any
stage. But there remained differences on substance and procedure.” In response to
a comment from the German Ambassador that “both the British and U-6 proposals
were dead in the water”, Sir Jeremy replied that the UK “would keep going”; the Azores
Summit “represented a final opportunity”.
570.  A scheduled meeting of the P5 was cancelled because there was “little to
talk about”.
571.  Sir Jeremy also spoke to Dr Blix, and to Mr Annan about “the leading role” he
(Mr Annan) could play in the event of conflict “in healing wounds and reinserting the
UN into the post-conflict situation”.
572.  Sir Jeremy concluded:
“The fact of the Azores Summit, the collapse of the U-6 compromise under our
combined pressure and general exhaustion here in New York, have all added up
to a less troublesome day than we might have expected.
“Clearly key decisions on the resolution will be made at the Summit. In addition
to any other instructions, grateful if you could consider whether it is worth giving
UNMOVIC/IAEA and the UN advance notice of any announcement on next steps so
that they can make the earliest possible preparations to evacuate staff from Iraq …”
573.  Mr Campbell wrote that on 14 March “the diplomatic scene was going nowhere but
we kept going with the line we were working flat out for a second resolution”.191
The UK decision that Iraq had committed further material breaches
THE EXCHANGE OF LETTERS OF 14 AND 15 MARCH 2003
574.  Resolution 1441 decided:
that Iraq had been and remained “in material breach of its obligations under
relevant resolutions”, in particular through its “failure to co-operate” with the
191  Campbell A & Hagerty B. The Alastair Campbell Diaries. Volume 4. The Burden of Power: Countdown
to Iraq. Hutchinson, 2012.
497
Previous page | Contents | Next page