Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.7  |  Development of UK strategy and options, 1 February to 7 March 2003
and VX. Since then, the inspectors had been prevented from doing their job properly.
War must be a last resort but the international community could not allow Saddam
Hussein to play games and spin things out. Proper access to scientists was one key
to progress.
860.  Mr Scarlett was reported to have told President Fox that the UK had developed:
“… a range of sources, some inside Iraq, that had proven reliability. We had built
up a consistent picture in which we had confidence. Our allies, including Europeans,
had no serious differences of substance with us …
“While we believed that UNSCOM had been able to disarticulate Iraq’s nuclear
programme it had not been able to account for a wide range of chemical and
biological materials – we were particularly worried about VX and anthrax. Even
conservative estimates of material Iraq still held indicated the capacity to assemble
thousands of WMD artillery shells. Since 1998 Iraq had continued to produce
new agents, develop its missile capability and, with less success, reconstitute
its nuclear programme.
“In 2002 a conscious decision was taken to deny possession of WMD to frustrate
a renewed and strengthened inspection programme. We had watched a policy
of concealment and intimidation develop. Evidence had been dispersed, factories
cleaned up and scientists cowed.
“… Some UNMOVIC successes in January resulted in further efforts to hide
evidence and deceive inspectors. Continued small successes forced Iraq
to move to a policy of slow, small concessions to give the impression of movement
(eg on missiles). For the UK, the litmus test would be interviews with scientists.
Iraq realised their knowledge was their Achilles heel, hence the intimidation.”
861.  President Fox was reported to have listened carefully and with an open mind.
Mexico wanted to continue to seek consensus. It did not like talk of action “with or
without the UN”; overriding international institutions had grave internal consequences
for countries nurturing fragile newly created institutions. He was attracted to the
Canadian idea of benchmarking Iraqi co-operation.
862.  Sir David Manning had concluded that Mexican support for a second resolution
was “not impossible, but would not be easy and would almost certainly require
some movement”.
863.  In a telephone conversation with Mr Blair on 2 March, before his meeting with
Sir David Manning and Mr Scarlett, President Lagos wondered if there was room for
clarification of what the Security Council was trying to achieve.269 He was worried that
talk of regime change was overshadowing the issue of disarmament in the media.
269  Letter Cannon to Owen, 3 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s Conversation with President of Chile,
2 March’.
335
Previous page | Contents | Next page