Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
956.  Lord Goldsmith’s requests to Mr Straw on 18 October and Mr Blair
on 22 October, to be invited to meetings and “to be kept closely informed
of developments”, which would have allowed him to be more involved in
discussions about the resolution and the policy behind it, were not followed
up by Mr Straw or Mr Blair.
957.  Despite agreement in July that Mr Blair and Lord Goldsmith should discuss
his advice in September, that discussion did not take place until 22 October.
958.  The meeting took place as a result of Lord Goldsmith raising his concerns
with Mr Powell and Mr Straw.
959.  Key decisions on the resolution had already been taken and the draft was
at an advanced stage.
960.  In his statement for the Inquiry, Lord Goldsmith wrote that he was not sufficiently
involved in the Ministerial meetings and discussions about the resolution and the policy
behind it. He had told:
Mr Straw on 18 October that he should be present at “any meetings between the
Prime Minister, the Foreign Secretary and others at which decisions on the use
of force were made”; and
Mr Blair in the meeting on 22 October that that it would be important for him
“to be kept closely informed of developments”. He had made it clear that he
“was available for a further meeting with the Prime Minister at any time”.350
961.  After that, Lord Goldsmith was not invited to key meetings to discuss the UK’s
negotiating strategy and the implications of changes to the draft resolution.
962.  There were inconsistencies about the level of involvement expected from
Lord Goldsmith.
963.  His advice was sought in the early stages of the development of the draft
resolution, but from late‑September onwards that was not the case.
964.  In his statement Lord Goldsmith wrote that there “was an inconsistent approach
within Government about the level of engagement that was expected” from him.351
965.  In the period between his meeting with Mr Blair on 22 October and his “telephone
call” with Mr Straw on 7 November, his “views were not sought”; and “During that period
… important changes [to the draft resolution] occurred.”352
350 Statement, 4 January 2011, paragraph 1.9.
351 Statement, 4 January 2011, paragraph 1.11.
352 Statement, 4 January 2011, paragraph 1.2.
370
Previous page | Contents | Next page