Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.5  |  Development of UK strategy and options, September to November 2002 –
the negotiation of resolution 1441
had “aggressively pursued weapons of mass destruction, even while inspectors were
inside the country”. The world had learned “an essential lesson” from that experience:
“… inspections will not result in a disarmed Iraq unless the Iraqi regime fully
co‑operates. Inspectors do not have the power to disarm an unwilling regime. They
can only confirm that a government has decided to disarm itself. History has shown
that when Iraqi leaders stall inspections and impede the progress, it means they
have something to hide.”
871.  President Bush warned Iraq that “the old game of cheat and retreat” would
“no longer be tolerated”; and:
“Any act of delay or defiance will be an additional breach of Iraq’s international
obligations, and a clear signal that the Iraqi regime has once again abandoned
the path of voluntary compliance.”
872.  Setting out the US standpoint, President Bush stated:
“With the passage of this resolution, the world must not lapse into unproductive
debates over whether specific instances of Iraqi non‑compliance are serious. Any
Iraqi non‑compliance is serious, because such bad faith will show that Iraq has no
intention of disarming …
“America will be making only one determination: is Iraq meeting the terms of the
Security Council resolution or not? The United States has agreed to discuss any
material breach with the Security Council, but without jeopardising our freedom
of action to defend our country. If Iraq fails to comply, the United States and other
nations will disarm Saddam Hussein.”
873.  President Bush stated that the US would support the UN inspections teams,
including with “information that can help identify illegal activities and materials in Iraq”,
and called on other nations and “patriotic Iraqis” to do the same. Saddam Hussein could
not “hide his weapons of mass destruction … without the co‑operation of hundreds and
thousands of Iraqis – those who work in the weapons programmes and those who are
responsible for concealing the weapons”.
874.  Framing action on Iraq squarely in the context of the threat from international
terrorism, President Bush stated:
“Americans recognise what is at stake. In fighting a war on terror, we are determined
to oppose every source of catastrophic harm that threatens our country, our friends,
and our allies … And we oppose a uniquely dangerous regime – a regime that has
harboured terrorists and can supply terrorists with weapons of mass destruction;
a regime that has built such terrible weapons and has used them to kill thousands;
a brutal regime with a history of both reckless ambition and reckless miscalculation.
355
Previous page | Contents | Next page