Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
Discussions with UNMOVIC revealed concerns focused on “the limited technical
knowledge of the sites and equipment to be inspected and poor quality of some
inspectors”. Dr Blix and the IAEA had “also expressed concerns about the lack of reliable
information currently available to them”. Dr Blix “would prefer to have any new UNSCR
agreed before the inspectors return[ed] to Iraq”. To be effective “he needed:
authority (including ability to freeze sites);
practical arrangements including regional bases;
a supporting threat (from the UN Security Council rather than forces on the
ground);
information on where to look.”
The Assessment stated that, “despite its public statements”, Iraq “would reluctantly judge
it had to accept” a new Security Council resolution:
“International pressure to do so would be overwhelming and rejection would trigger
military action to overthrow the regime. A further round of technical talks might be
required to take account of a new UNSCR. […] Saddam may lose patience at the
constant pressures … and refuse to co‑operate. A resolution with such stringent
conditions that it threatened Iraq’s sovereignty or the regime’s confidence in its
concealment policy would clearly increase the likelihood of such a refusal. On
balance, however … Iraq is likely to accept a new resolution, play for time and rely
on concealment to deal with inspections.
“In the short term, we do not expect the same level of intimidation and obstruction
that UNSCOM encountered. But a policy of deniable obstruction is likely, where
problems at individual inspection sites are blamed on over‑zealous local Iraqi
officials, avoiding too obvious a challenge to the authority of the UN. However,
we cannot rule out a mistake by Saddam that would result in a serious breach
of UNMOVIC’s mandate and bring about the military attack he seeks to avoid.”
Concealment tactics
“A body of intelligence” indicated that “concealment and dispersal of sensitive items” were
“the main planks of Iraq’s strategy to deal with the return of weapons inspectors”. Saddam
Hussein had “reportedly taken into account the experience gained during the UNSCOM
inspections” and believed he could “exploit weaknesses in the inspections regime” in
resolution 1284.
The JIC stated:
“Iraq’s current preparedness to be flexible on access to these sites [presidential
palaces as defined in a 1998 MOU [Memorandum of Understanding] between Iraq
and the UN] should be seen in the light of this intelligence. Qusay [Saddam Hussein’s
son] also instructed that the production of sensitive materials be moved to other
secret locations. We have little intelligence on these locations and Blix has expressed
his concern at this weakness.”
Iraq’s concealment efforts were “widespread”; Iraq had “had time to prepare”; and stocks
of chemical and biological weapons would be “considerably smaller than after the Gulf
War”. Intelligence showed that:
“… steps were being taken to prevent weapons inspectors from finding any prohibited
weapons, sensitive papers and documents, including by hiding them in residential
274
Previous page | Contents | Next page