Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.5  |  Development of UK strategy and options, September to November 2002 –
the negotiation of resolution 1441
US/UK draft resolution, 25 September 2002
236.  The UK and the US eventually agreed the text of a draft resolution as the
basis for discussion with other members of the P5 on 25 September.
237.  The detailed text of a draft resolution for discussion with other members of the P5
was finally agreed in a conference call between Mr Straw, Secretary Powell, Dr Rice and
officials, including Sir David Manning and Sir Jeremy Greenstock, on 25 September.74
238.  In the conference call:
It was agreed to set the timeline for the production of an Iraqi declaration as
“prior to the beginning of inspections and not later than 30 days of the date
of the resolution”.
Following a discussion of Dr Blix’s reservations about interviewing Iraqi officials
outside Iraq and concerns that they would be used to seek asylum, Dr Rice
stated that conducting interviews outside Iraq was “a red line” for the US.
It was agreed that the resolution should allow Permanent Members of the
Security Council to request representation on the inspection teams. Dr Rice’s
view was that there was “no need to be sympathetic to Iraqi concerns” that that
would be a route for the US and UK to get intelligence for military strikes.
Dr Rice said that there was no intention to force inspections but the US wanted
to “signal that conditions were different”. It was “important to have things in the
resolution to discard later”.
Reflecting UK concerns about US draft language on provisions for No‑Fly
or No‑Drive Zones, which Mr Straw described as looking like “an attempt to
legitimise NFZs” – which was “not necessary for the future and dangerous for
the past” – it was agreed that the draft should distinguish zones for the purposes
of the resolution from the existing No‑Fly Zones.
Reflecting Sir Jeremy Greenstock’s concerns that there were “many things in
the text that looked like trip wires”, and that it would be “better to judge Iraq by
its actions not its words”, it was agreed that Iraq should be given a week, not
48 hours, to indicate that it accepted the resolution.
It was agreed that it would be better to engage Russia and France “at a political
level” before the French and Russian Permanent Representatives to the
UN “got their hands on the text”. As the US and UK got close to agreement,
senior officials should be sent to Moscow and Paris “to begin the task of selling
the text”.
74 Telegram 498 FCO London to Washington, 25 September 2002, ‘Iraq: Foreign Secretary’s Conference
Call with US Administration, 25 September’.
243
Previous page | Contents | Next page