Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.4  |  Development of UK strategy and options, late July to 14 September 2002
declaration alternative. Saddam was intelligent and well advised; he could be coached
into providing a difficult answer.”
518.  In response to a question from Sir Jeremy Greenstock about whether the US was
genuine about the UN approach or whether it was “a brief effort before the early use
of force”, with the status of inspectors the key difference between the two approaches,
Secretary Powell said that President Bush was not doing this as a fig leaf for war: the
US could not act unilaterally; it needed too much help in the region. Secretary Powell
added that the US needed more than resolution 1284 (1999). If the UN approach worked
and regime change “dropped away”, the US would need a really tough inspection regime
(“Blix plus plus”), not a weak UNSCOM.
519.  Mr Straw gave an account of Sir David Manning’s telephone conversation with
Dr Rice earlier that day, which Secretary Powell summed up as the UK saying that the
US can’t say “we don’t like the answer [to our declaration demand], we’re going to war”.
Secretary Powell advised that Mr Blair might need to make the importance he attached
to the return of inspectors clear to President Bush.
520.  Mr Straw sent Mr Blair a separate minute reporting the conversation and
“recommend[ing] strongly” that Mr Blair should speak to President Bush after his
speech “to secure a reconfirmation” of what he had agreed at Camp David.157 Mr Straw
suggested that Mr Blair should also “dismiss” any idea of simply giving Iraq 15‑30 days
to explain the discrepancies the inspectors had unearthed then moving to military action
rather than seeking the insertion of inspectors.
521.  Sir David Manning told Dr Rice that Mr Blair thought President Bush should
use his speech at the UN General Assembly to make a virtue of going the
UN route.
522.  Sir David Manning spoke again to Dr Rice at 12.15pm on 11 September.158
He suggested that President Bush’s speech needed to expand his concluding sentence
on the role of the UN by announcing he would be proposing a new resolution “within
the next few days”. That would have “immediate impact at the UN and great resonance
in Europe and more widely. At present the speech left us hanging.” It was “at best, only
implicit” what President Bush thought the UN should do.
523.  In response to a question from Dr Rice, Sir David told her he was “confident” that
was Mr Blair’s view. The President should use the speech to make a virtue of going the
UN route.
524.  Dr Rice told Sir David that President Bush “would probably be ready to do this”
for Mr Blair.
157 Minute Straw to Prime Minister, 10 September 2002, ‘US/Iraq’.
158 Minute Manning to Prime Minister, 11 September 2002, ‘Iraq: Conversation with Condi Rice’.
181
Previous page | Contents | Next page