Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.2  |  Development of UK strategy and options, January to April 2002 – “axis of evil” to Crawford
undermining efforts to keep Saddam nervous about the West’s intentions while
efforts are made to re-open weapon inspections.”89
246.  The article also reported “Signs of real unease” had begun to emerge “last night”
about “the perceived hardening of Tony Blair’s opposition towards Iraq”. Officials had
described the discussion in Cabinet as a thoughtful and sombre discussion of the
options. Downing Street had denied that a Minister had spoken out against the military
option.
247.  Lord Wilson told the Inquiry that, the day after the 7 March Cabinet, reports of the
meeting “appeared in virtually every newspaper”.90 The reports were not very accurate,
but they had “caused huge ructions”.
248.  Given Mr Blair’s subsequent actions, the question of what Cabinet Members
understood they had endorsed is a matter of some importance.
249.  Cabinet minutes do not provide a verbatim record of the discussion in
Cabinet. Their purpose is to provide a record of the key points made and the
decisions taken.
250.  The discussion undoubtedly took place against a background of
considerable Parliamentary, public and media debate about possible US military
action to depose and replace Saddam Hussein and whether the UK would support
and participate in such action.
251.  In the previous week, both Mr Blair and Mr Straw had made public
statements that Iraq was a threat which had to be dealt with, and Mr Straw
reiterated to Cabinet the need for the British public and international opinion to
understand “the true nature of the threat posed by the [Iraqi] regime and the need
to respond effectively”.
252.  The discussion in Cabinet was couched in terms of Iraq’s need to comply
with its obligations and future choices by the international community on how
to respond to the threat which Iraq represented.
253.  Mr Blair and Mr Straw went to some lengths to assure their colleagues that
no decisions had been taken and Cabinet was not being asked to take decisions.
254.  Cabinet did endorse the conclusion that Iraq’s WMD programmes posed a
threat to peace and a strategy of engaging closely with the US Government in
order to shape policy and its presentation. But it did not discuss how that might
be achieved.
89  The Guardian, 8 March 2002, Cabinet concern grows over Blair’s tough talk on Iraq.
90  Public hearing, 25 January 2011, page 88.
431
Previous page | Contents | Next page