Previous page | Contents | Next page
16.3  |  Military fatalities and the bereaved
316.  Legal Help might be available (subject to a means test) to provide legal advice
and assistance before an inquest.
317.  The Deepcut Review into the circumstances surrounding the deaths of four
soldiers at the Princess Royal Barracks, Deepcut between 1995 and 2002, led by
Mr Nicholas Blake, reported in March 2006.200 He concluded that the participation of
the family of the deceased in an inquest was desirable, and that their participation was
assisted by “having experienced legal professionals to advise them whether there are
reasons for concern, and how they can be properly addressed”. He also concluded that,
in some circumstances, it was “invidious for the Army to be legally represented at such
an inquest at public expense whilst the family is not”.
318.  Mr Blake recommended:
“As part of the military covenant with the soldier, the MOD should ensure that the
family of a deceased soldier have access to legal advice and, where appropriate,
legal representation prior to, and during, the inquest or FAI [Fatal Accidents Inquiry].”
319.  The Government’s formal response to the Deepcut Review was issued in June,
and stated:
“An inquest is an inquisitorial, non‑adversarial fact finding process of limited
scope which does not make findings of civil or criminal liability. It is the general
presumption that legal representation is not necessary, and it is quite appropriate
for those deemed interested persons by the Coroner to ask questions of witnesses
at an inquest without legal assistance. Government provision of legal aid ... is
not therefore normally available ... However, under the Access to Justice Act
1999 allocation may be made to the Legal Services Commission for exceptional
funding.”201
320.  Ms Harman met relatives of Service Personnel killed in Iraq on 4 December, to
discuss their experience of the investigation and inquest process.202 The formal record
of the meeting reported that families “would like to be informed of their right to have legal
representation [at an inquest], and that the Government should provide funding for legal
representation where families could not afford it”.
321.  Ms Harman wrote to Mr Browne later that month summarising the conclusions
of the meeting; her letter did not address the issue of legal representation.203
200  Nicholas Blake QC, A Review of the circumstances surrounding the deaths of four soldiers at Princess
Royal Barracks, Deepcut, between 1995 and 2002, HC795, 29 March 2006, paragraph 12.110 and
recommendation 31.
201  Ministry of Defence, The Government’s Response to the Deepcut Review, Cm 6851, June 2006.
202  Report Opinion Leader, January 2007, ‘DCA meeting with families of military personnel who lost their
lives in Iraq’.
203  Letter Harman to Browne, 18 December 2006, ‘Proposals arising from meeting with relatives of service
personnel on their experience of the inquest system’.
131
Previous page | Contents | Next page