Previous page | Contents | Next page
16.2  |  Support for injured Service Personnel and veterans
Variations in the level of support after an operational deployment
113.  The Inquiry heard from a number of veterans and witnesses that the level of
support received by personnel returning from Op TELIC varied significantly.
114.  The Inquiry asked Lieutenant General Sir Alistair Irwin, Adjutant General from 2003
to 2005, whether he was aware of that variation and, if so, what was done to address it.77
He told the Inquiry:
“… we were aware that there were varying standards … That was obviously a worry
because, where the standard was good, that was fine. Where the standard was not
good, then something clearly needed to be done about it.
“So there was a constant interchange between my people, who were producing the
advice, the guidance, the policy, and the people who were actually delivering these
things, which were … the welfare staffs … the field Army and the chain of command.
“… there was, amongst us all collectively, a desire to deliver as good a product
as we could for those who needed it but, when it boils down to it, when you have
a complex machine that consists of over 100,000 individual people, you can be
absolutely certain, no matter what it is that you do, that there will be people who one
way or another don’t live up to the standard required.
“So much to the regret of all of us involved, there were unquestionably people who
weren’t looked after as well as they should have been. There is no doubt about that
and each one of them represents, in some degree or another, a failure.
“I hope, though … without in any way wanting to sound complacent about it, that that
number was probably relatively small.”
115.  Lt Gen Irwin agreed that those individuals were more likely to have returned to
environments without significant military support around them, including Reservists
returning to civilian life and Regular Personnel living away from barracks.
116.  Vice Admiral Peter Wilkinson, Deputy Chief of Defence Staff (Personnel)
from 2007, told the Inquiry:
“Certainly, when we started the campaign, we were much more adept at looking
after the large, formed units than we were on those individuals who had either gone
out as single staff or on an augmentee basis.
“I think, as we have gained greater experience of the operation and of the likely
pressures on the troops, then we have become more adept and more proactive at
looking after their likely needs.”78
77  Public hearing, 21 July 2010, pages 29-31.
78  Public hearing, 19 July 2010, page 24.
61
Previous page | Contents | Next page