Previous page | Contents | Next page
14.1  |  Military equipment (post-conflict)
1166.  On 16 February, Mr Stephen Smith, Deputy Command Secretary at PJHQ,
sought Mr Ingram’s approval to deploy additional weapons on counter‑IDF operations,
in addition to the Light Guns and C‑RAM systems.614 He wrote that IDF was responsible
for “inflicting the second highest number of casualties against the UK after IEDs” and the
threat was likely to increase when UK forces re‑postured to the COB.
1167.  Physical protection measures were “approaching their practical limit” until a
Tier 3 solution was delivered and Maj Gen Shirreff had reported that IDF was “having
a detrimental psychological effect on our troops”.
1168.  Mr Ingram replied on 19 February, agreeing that the extra weapons could be
deployed.615
1169.  In a Force Level Review on 26 February, Lt Gen Houghton advised that there
was “scope to re‑task” up to two Sea King helicopters to other operations by mid‑June
because of “MND(SE) force dispositions and Merlin SH capacity”.616
1170.  Lt Gen Houghton suggested that the four remaining Sea King helicopters would
be dedicated to ISTAR, but it might be possible to withdraw some of them with the arrival
of other UAVs anticipated later in the year, including Hermes 450 in mid‑June.
1171.  Lt Gen Houghton wrote that “the very best case ISD” for the UK C‑RAM capability
to protect the COB was 31 May and it seemed “highly likely” to slip. He added: “The
battle procedure to deliver this is ongoing and the system will require up to 100
personnel to support it.”
1172.  On 7 March, Mr Browne sent “a personal memo” to Mr Ingram and Lord Drayson
about IDF.617 He wrote:
“IDF is an issue we have all been aware of, and striving to address, for some months
now.”
1173.  Mr Browne noted that “significant improvements” had been made but “also, with
real concern, the new estimate of the likelihood of a successful indirect fire attack” and
its consequences:
“IDF must be one of our very highest priorities. I am not convinced that our current
plans are ambitious or decisive enough.”
614  Minute Smith to PS/Min(AF), 16 February 2007, ‘Iraq: Countering Indirect Fire Attacks’.
615  Minute Johnson to PS/Minister(AF), 19 February 2007, ‘Iraq: Countering Indirect Fire Attacks’.
616  Minute Houghton to Chiefs of Staff, 26 February 2007, ‘Op TELIC 10/11 Force Level Review – Feb 07’.
617  Minute SofS [MOD] to Min(AF), 7 March 2007, ‘Iraq – Force Protection Risks – Indirect Fire, Personal
Memo from SofS’.
199
Previous page | Contents | Next page