Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
953.  For battlefield helicopters, Mr Woolley wrote that “planned activity levels over the
next two years remain at or above the maximum concurrency assumed in provisional
DPAs”. Commitments were only being met by compromising the Harmony Guidelines503
and using crews and key support staff at tour intervals of “1on/2off or less” instead of
“1on/4 off”.
954.  Mr Woolley concluded:
“Increasing significantly the size of rotorcraft fleet and training more crews are
not realistic options, nor in the short term is reducing the level of operational
commitment. The only viable strategy is to accept a reduced harmony ratio of
1on/2 off over the next two years, requiring careful management of key personnel.
The Puma and Chinook fleets are currently under the greatest pressure.”
955.  The £3.2bn across 10 years for investment in the FRC programme had also been
affected, with £60m from the first eight years having been re‑profiled. Mr Woolley wrote
that “considerable effort” had gone into identifying the consequences of that decision
for existing helicopter fleets and “the most significant risk” would be sustaining Puma
and Lynx through to the introduction of their replacements. Additional funding had been
allocated to Lynx to extend its time in service until its replacement was available, albeit
at a reduced fleet size of 66 (from 82).
956.  The DMB agreed that a measure to reduce Joint Helicopter Command (JHC)
activity levels should be offset by measures to restore Chinook and Puma funding
because “it was felt that these additional costs were an acceptable financial risk, given
the significant operational benefits”.504
957.  A proposed reduction in Gazelle activity was rejected, with compensating savings
to be found elsewhere in the land budget. The activity reductions for other helicopters
“although unwelcome, were acceptable”.
958.  The MOD told the Inquiry that it withdrew its Chinook helicopters from Iraq in 2005
in order to prepare for operations in Afghanistan and replaced them with the Merlin
helicopters.505 The MOD stated that was because Chinook helicopters were better suited
to the challenging conditions found in Afghanistan.
959.  In a statement to the Inquiry, ACM Torpy explained:
“… as confidence in Merlin grew it was possible to withdraw Chinook from Iraq to
allow the force to recuperate from a prolonged period on operations. It also gave
the force the opportunity to prepare for operations in Afghanistan, where the hot
503  Harmony Guidelines described the maximum time that Service Personnel should spend away from
their families (known as Individual Separated Service) and the minimum time that they should have
between operational deployments (known as tour intervals). Harmony Guidelines are addressed in detail
in Section 16.1.
504  Minutes, 26 January 2005, Defence Management Board meeting.
505  Paper [MOD], 1 March 2011, ‘Request for Evidence, Support Helicopters’.
162
Previous page | Contents | Next page