Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
671.  Lord Jay also told the Inquiry:
“… when there is a crisis of the same magnitude as Iraq, which affects a number
of different departments, then the Treasury needs to look, not at the budgets of
individual departments, but at the overall need and to ensure that each department
concerned in the operation gets the funds that it needs to carry it out … But it
doesn’t seem to me at all sensible to be thinking of giving large sums of money for
a military operation, if you are not giving similar sums of money for the diplomatic
support that that military operation needs, and those need to be looked at together,
and I don’t think they were, and I think they should be in the future.”419
672.  Mr Dodds told the Inquiry that bids from the FCO were assessed with the same
rigour as bids from other departments:
“… our starting position was that we would want the Foreign Office to … look for the
potential to reprioritise … I think our perspective would be that that wasn’t … their
first response to this sort of situation. I think there was an expectation on the part
of the Foreign Office that … the Reserve should provide them with new money …
“But … the Foreign Office had a … significant budget … and a significant global
footprint and I think it wasn’t unreasonable to be looking to the Foreign Office … at
least on a temporary basis, to move some resources … to support the activity on
this high priority [Iraq].
“Generally speaking, they were able to successfully reprioritise, but … their first
reaction was to look for resources from the Reserve, but it was only after they
were … pushed back that they … then were successful in reprioritising.”420
673.  Sir Suma Chakrabarti told the Inquiry that Iraq was DFID’s largest bilateral
programme in 2003/04 (when DFID spent £209m, of which £110m was spent on
humanitarian relief and £99m on development activities), and DFID’s 10th largest
bilateral programme in 2004/05 (when DFID spent £49m, of which £21m was spent
on humanitarian relief and £28m on development activities).421
674.  The Inquiry asked Sir Suma whether DFID had considered seeking additional
funding from the Treasury for Iraq.422 He told the Inquiry:
“We had discussions [with] the Treasury but it was quite obvious to us that they
weren’t going to give any more than they already had … They had put some money
in upfront [in March 2003, for humanitarian assistance], but, after that, they said it is
time to reprioritise.”
419 Public hearing, 30 June 2010, page 54.
420 Public hearing, 14 July 2010, pages 33-36.
421 Public hearing, 22 January 2010, page 38.
422 Public hearing, 22 January 2010, pages 38‑40.
556
Previous page | Contents | Next page