Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
445.  Mr Heywood wrote to Mr Hoon’s Private Secretary on 23 October:
“The Prime Minister shares the Chancellor’s – and Sir Andrew Likierman’s – concern
about recent financial developments within MOD …
“However, given the late stage of the financial year and so as to minimise the
disruption to front line defence and morale at this critical time, the Prime Minister and
Chancellor are prepared to agree a one‑off cash uplift of £400m for 2003/04 …”261
446.  That uplift was conditional on MOD agreement to an externally led review of
its financial control arrangements, and an assurance it would make maximum use
of savings generated by its efficiency programme to ensure that cash and resource
spending were properly controlled. Once the review had made its recommendations and
any changes to the MOD financial controls had been implemented, the Treasury would
look again at Mr Hoon’s request for extra cash for 2004/05 and 2005/06.
447.  Sir Kevin Tebbit told the Inquiry that it was the MOD’s normal practice to appeal
to Mr Blair on funding issues:
“… given the particular nature of the Blair Government, the MOD tended to look
to … the Prime Minister for understanding and support in the budgetary context.
Some other departments went direct to the Chancellor. We usually tried to operate
through Number 10 because we were always coping with the problem of a policy
ambition which the Prime Minister subscribed to, which was never quite matched
by the financial attitude of the Chancellor.”262
448.  The external review of the MOD’s cash management arrangements (the
Likierman review), which was undertaken by Cap Gemini Ernst and Young, issued
on 25 November.263
449.  Mr Woolley forwarded the review to Mr Hoon and Sir Kevin Tebbit the following
day.264 He commented:
“While not a report we would ourselves have written … [it] provides only very limited
support to the criticisms levelled at the department [the MOD] by the Chancellor and
the Chief Secretary.”
450.  Mr Woolley said that the review confirmed that RAB did not require departments
to control net cash or near cash, which was “the kernel of our case”.
261 Letter Heywood to Watkins, 21 October 2003 [sic], ‘Defence Budget’.
262 Private hearing, 6 May 2010, pages 40‑41.
263 Report Cap Gemini Ernst and Young, 25 November 2003, ‘Review of MOD Cash Management
Arrangements’.
264 Minute Woolley to Hoon, 26 November 2003, ‘PSX 26 November – CGEY Report’.
516
Previous page | Contents | Next page